The morphological diversities among star-forming galaxies at high redshifts in the great observatories origins deep survey

被引:144
作者
Ravindranath, Swara
Giavalisco, Mauro
Ferguson, Henry C.
Conselice, Christopher
Katz, Neal
Weinberg, Martin
Lotz, Jennifer
Dickinson, Mark
Fall, S. Michael
Mobasher, Bahram
Papovich, Casey
机构
[1] Space Telescope Sci Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Phys & Astron, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Astron, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[5] Natl Opt Astron Observ, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[6] Univ Arizona, Steward Observ, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : fundamental parameters; galaxies : structure;
D O I
10.1086/507016
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We used the deep, multiwavelength images obtained by the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) to identify similar to 4700 Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) at z > 2.5, and 292 starburst galaxies at z similar to 1.2. We present the results from morphological analysis based on light profile shape and ellipticity for similar to 1333 of the most luminous LBGs. About 40% of LBGs at z similar to 3 have exponential profiles, similar to 30% of the galaxies have steep (r(1/4)-like) profiles, and similar to 30% of LBGs have multiple cores of disturbed morphologies suggestive of close pairs or mergers. The fraction of spheriod-like LBGs decrease by about 15% from z similar to 5 to 3. A comparison of LBGs with the starburst galaxies at z similar to 1.2 shows that disklike and merger morphologies are dominant, but the fraction of spheroid-like profiles is about 20% higher among LBGs. The ellipticity distribution for LBGs exhibits a pronounced skew toward high ellipticities (epsilon > 0.5), which cannot be explained by morphologies similar to the local disks and spheroids viewed at random orientations. The peak of the distribution evolves toward lower epsilon, from 0.7 at z = 4 to similar to 0.5 at z = 3. The ellipticity distribution for the z similar to 1.2 galaxies is relatively flat, similar to that seen for present-day galaxies. The dominance of elongated morphologies suggests that in a significant fraction of LBGs we may be witnessing star formation in clumps along gas-rich filaments, or the earliest gas-rich bars that encompass essentially the entire visible galaxy.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 980
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   The morphologies of distant galaxies .2. Classifications from the Hubble Space Telescope Medium Deep Survey [J].
Abraham, RG ;
vandenBergh, S ;
Glazebrook, K ;
Ellis, RS ;
Santiago, BX ;
Surma, P ;
Griffiths, RE .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1996, 107 (01) :1-&
[2]   The spatial clustering of star-forming galaxies at redshifts 1.4 ≲ z ≲ 3.5 [J].
Adelberger, KL ;
Steidel, CC ;
Pettini, M ;
Shapley, AE ;
Reddy, NA ;
Erb, DK .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 619 (02) :697-713
[3]   A counts-in-cells analysis of Lyman-Break galaxies at redshift z∼3 [J].
Adelberger, KL ;
Steidel, CC ;
Giavalisco, M ;
Dickinson, M ;
Pettini, M ;
Kellogg, M .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 505 (01) :18-24
[4]   The shapes of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey [J].
Alam, SMK ;
Ryden, BS .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 570 (02) :610-617
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1936, The Realm of the Nebulae
[6]   The GALEX VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey measurement of the evolution of the 1500 luminosity function [J].
Arnouts, S ;
Schiminovich, D ;
Ilbert, O ;
Tresse, L ;
Milliard, B ;
Treyer, M ;
Bardelli, S ;
Budavari, T ;
Wyder, TK ;
Zucca, E ;
Le Fèvre, O ;
Martin, DC ;
Vettolani, G ;
Adami, C ;
Arnaboldi, M ;
Barlow, T ;
Bianchi, L ;
Bolzonella, M ;
Bottini, D ;
Byun, YI ;
Cappi, A ;
Charlot, S ;
Contini, T ;
Donas, J ;
Forster, K ;
Foucaud, S ;
Franzetti, P ;
Friedman, PG ;
Garilli, B ;
Gavignaud, I ;
Guzzo, L ;
Heckman, TM ;
Hoopes, C ;
Iovino, A ;
Jelinsky, P ;
Le Brun, V ;
Lee, YW ;
Maccagni, D ;
Madore, BF ;
Malina, R ;
Marano, B ;
Marinoni, C ;
McCracken, HJ ;
Mazure, A ;
Meneux, B ;
Merighi, R ;
Morrissey, P ;
Neff, S ;
Paltani, S ;
Pellò, R .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 619 (01) :L43-L46
[7]   GEMS:: The surface brightness and surface mass density evolution of disk galaxies [J].
Barden, M ;
Rix, HW ;
Somerville, RS ;
Bell, EF ;
Häubler, B ;
Peng, CY ;
Borch, A ;
Beckwith, SVW ;
Caldwell, JAR ;
Heymans, C ;
Jahnke, K ;
Jogee, S ;
McIntosh, DH ;
Meisenheimer, K ;
Sánchez, SF ;
Wisotzki, L ;
Wolf, C .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 635 (02) :959-981
[8]   Bayesian photometric redshift estimation [J].
Benítez, N .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 536 (02) :571-583
[9]   SExtractor: Software for source extraction [J].
Bertin, E ;
Arnouts, S .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1996, 117 (02) :393-404
[10]   Recent star formation in nearby galaxies from Galaxy Evolution Explorer imaging:: M101 and M51 [J].
Bianchi, L ;
Thilker, DA ;
Burgarella, D ;
Friedman, PG ;
Hoopes, CG ;
Boissier, S ;
de Paz, AG ;
Barlow, TA ;
Byun, YI ;
Donas, J ;
Forster, K ;
Heckman, TM ;
Jelinsky, PN ;
Lee, YW ;
Madore, BF ;
Malina, RF ;
Martin, DC ;
Milliard, B ;
Morrissey, P ;
Neff, SG ;
Rich, RM ;
Schiminovich, D ;
Siegmund, OHW ;
Small, T ;
Szalay, AS ;
Welsh, BY ;
Wyder, TK .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 619 (01) :L71-L74