The effects of restraint using self-locking stanchions on dairy cows in relation to behavior, feed intake, physiological parameters, health, and milk yield

被引:37
作者
Bolinger, DJ
Albright, JL
MorrowTesch, J
Kenyon, SJ
Cunningham, MD
机构
[1] PURDUE UNIV,DEPT ANIM SCI,USDA ARS,LIVESTOCK BEHAV RES UNIT,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
[2] PURDUE UNIV,DEPT ANIM SCI,SCH VET MED,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
关键词
behavior; physiological parameters; restraint; well-being;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76193-9
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Holstein cows (n = 64) ranging from peak to end lactation were restrained in self-locking stanchions (i.e., head locks) for approximately 4 h/d for four periods in a modified switchback design. Milk yield, milk fat percentage, somatic cell count, and dry matter intake and dry matter intake were unaffected by restraint. Milk protein percentage was significantly lower for cows that were restrained. Plasma cortisol concentrations and the ratio of neutrophils to mononuclear cells were not significantly different between restrained and unrestrained (control) cows. No difference in the incidence of mastitis or other health concerns was noted. Behaviorally, cows that were locked in the stanchions spent significantly more time lying after release from restraint. For cows that were locked up, eating frequency over 24 h was significantly reduced, but dry matter intake was not affected. Total rumination frequency over 24 h was not significantly different for cows that were restraubed; however, cows that were restrained ruminated less during the day following release. Grooming was considered to be a behavioral need and was significantly increased during all times when cows were not locked up. Grooming was also one of the first behaviors performed following release. Acts of aggression were elevated during all periods following restraint, but oral behaviors, such as tongue playing and chewing on objects, drinking behavior, and resting postures were not affected. The use of self-locking stanchions did not appear to affect substantially the overall wellbeing of the cow.
引用
收藏
页码:2411 / 2417
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Arave C. W., 1996, Journal of Dairy Science, V79, P191
[2]  
Arave C. W., 1996, Journal of Animal Science, V74, P43
[3]  
*FED AM SOC FOOD A, 1997, IN PRESS GUID CAR US
[4]  
Fraser A.F., 1990, Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare
[5]   WHY THE STUDY OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOR IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ANIMAL-WELFARE ISSUE [J].
GONYOU, HW .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1994, 72 (08) :2171-2177
[6]   THE EFFECT OF AGE AT TETHERING ON BEHAVIOR OF HEIFER CALVES [J].
JENSEN, MB .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (04) :227-238
[7]   BEHAVIOR OF DAIRY-COWS KEPT IN EXTENSIVE (LOOSE HOUSING PASTURE) OR INTENSIVE (TIE STALL) ENVIRONMENTS .3. GROOMING, EXPLORATION AND ABNORMAL-BEHAVIOR [J].
KROHN, CC .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1994, 42 (02) :73-86
[8]  
MCFARLAND DF, 1995, P 2 W LARG HERD DAIR, P81
[9]  
METZ JHM, 1984, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V13, P301
[10]  
*MIDW PLAN SERV, 1985, DAIR HOUS EQ HDB