Identification of high-risk residents

被引:35
作者
Bergen, PC
Littlefield, JH
O'Keefe, GE
Rege, RV
Anthony, TA
Kim, LT
Turnage, RH
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
surgical education; evaluation; performance;
D O I
10.1006/jsre.2000.5924
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Identification of high-risk residents allows remediation and support for administrative action when necessary. This study characterizes differences in documentation of marginally performing residents in a general surgery residency. Methods. High-risk residents were identified by the former program director. Twenty-four of one hundred fifteen residents over a 10-year period had one to four problematic areas: cognitive, synthetic, family/health, and interpersonal skills. Outcomes included finished (18), voluntary withdrawal (1), and involuntary withdrawal (5), A case-control study matching controls to cases by date of entry into the training program was used, Records were reviewed for demographics, preentry qualifications, American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE) scores, letters of complaint or praise, events of counseling, and monthly ratings. The records of 48 residents were reviewed. Ward evaluations were on eight categories with a 5-point Leikert scale (3-unacceptable to 7-outstanding). The evaluation score assigns points only to low ratings. High scores represent progressively poorer performance. A Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to compare the cases and controls for continuous variables. The McNemar test was used in comparisons of categorical data with binary outcomes. Exact P values are reported. Results. Objective data were similar for both groups. Study residents tended to score higher on monthly evaluations at Year 2 and by Year 3 this achieved significance (0.026). Study residents were more likely to have negative faculty letters (0.016) and events of counseling by a faculty member (0.017) and the program director (0.005). Conclusions. Identification of residents at risk should begin as early as possible during training. A combination of faculty evaluations and evidence of letters of counseling can detect high-risk residents. Programs may use such indicators to support decisions regarding remedial work or administrative action. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 244
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Bosk CL., 1979, Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure
[2]  
DAVIS JS, 1986, EVALUATE RESIDENTS, P73
[3]   Global rating scales in residency education [J].
Gray, JD .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (01) :S55-S63
[4]   FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PREVAILING MODEL OF CLINICAL-EVALUATION SYSTEMS IN NORTH-AMERICAN MEDICAL-SCHOOLS [J].
HUNT, DD .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1992, 67 (04) :254-259
[5]   Improving the quality of resident performance appraisals [J].
Littlefield, J ;
Terrell, C .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1997, 72 (10) :S45-S47
[6]  
Murphy K., 1995, Understanding performance appraisal : social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives
[7]   INFLUENCE OF ANESTHESIOLOGY RESIDENTS NONCOGNITIVE SKILLS ON THE OCCURRENCE OF CRITICAL INCIDENTS AND THE RESIDENTS OVERALL CLINICAL-PERFORMANCES [J].
RHOTON, MF ;
BARNES, A ;
FLASHBURG, M ;
RONAI, A ;
SPRINGMAN, S .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1991, 66 (06) :359-361
[8]  
RHOTON MF, 1989, MED EDUC, V23, P280