Current practice in the United Kingdom for the use of diagnostic laparoscopy in suspected acute appendicitis

被引:5
作者
Stechman, M. J. [1 ]
Roy, D. [1 ]
Mainprize, K. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Surg, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[2] Milton Keynes Dist Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
关键词
Diagnostic laparoscopy; laparoscopic appendicectomy; acute appendicitis; right iliac fossa pain; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; CHANGING TRENDS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01716.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Diagnostic laparoscopy is advocated in the management of patients with acute right iliac fossa pain. We asked consultant surgeons in the UK about their current use of this technique. Method A short anonymous questionnaire was sent to consultant surgeons from the ASGBI database. Information was sought on general surgical specialty, participation in the emergency surgical on-call rota, current practice regarding the use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and on the management of an inflamed or noninflamed appendix. Statistical analysis was by means of KH2 test. Results There were 161 eligible returns from 250 questionnaires (64%) and the proportion of consultants replying from each subspecialty was similar to membership numbers of subspecialty organizations. Most consultants (68%) performed diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. The majority (69%) reserved its use for women of reproductive age and 14% of respondents laparoscoped all patients with suspected appendicitis. Compared to nongastrointestinal (GI), GI surgeons were significantly more likely to perform diagnostic laparoscopy (75 vs 52%, P = 0.008). In the case of an overtly inflamed appendix, 81% of respondents would remove it laparoscopically with significantly more GI surgeons following this course than nonGI surgeons (P = 0.04). Conclusion Despite good evidence on the benefits of diagnostic laparoscopy in certain patients with suspected acute appendicitis, there is significant variation in its use. This difference appears to be based upon subspecialty and may be as a result of increasing subspecialization.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 820
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Al-Khayal KA, 2007, SAUDI MED J, V28, P173
[2]   A PRACTICAL SCORE FOR THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
ALVARADO, A .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (05) :557-564
[3]   Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis? [J].
Andersson, RE ;
Hugander, AP ;
Ghazi, SH ;
Ravn, H ;
Offenbartl, SK ;
Nyström, PO ;
Olaison, GP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 166 (10) :796-802
[4]   Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis [J].
Andersson, RE ;
Hugander, A ;
Ravn, H ;
Offenbartl, K ;
Ghazi, SH ;
Nyström, PO ;
Olaison, G .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 24 (04) :479-485
[5]   Implications of removing a normal appendix [J].
Bijnen, CL ;
van den Broek, WT ;
Bijnen, AB ;
de Ruiter, P ;
Gouma, DJ .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 20 (02) :115-119
[6]   Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? [J].
Cothren, CC ;
Moore, EE ;
Johnson, JL ;
Moore, JB ;
Ciesla, DJ ;
Burch, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (06) :950-954
[7]   Randomized clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain [J].
Decadt, B ;
Sussman, L ;
Lewis, MPN ;
Secker, A ;
Cohen, L ;
Rogers, C ;
Patel, A ;
Rhodes, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (11) :1383-1386
[8]   LAPAROSCOPY IN THE PREVENTION OF UNNECESSARY APPENDECTOMIES - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
DEUTSCH, AA ;
ZELIKOVSKY, A ;
REISS, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (06) :336-337
[9]  
*DOH, 2005, IMPL PAYM RES 2005 6
[10]   Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis (Br J Surg 2008; 95: 363-368) [J].
Faiz, O. ;
Aylin, P. ;
Bottle, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (06) :801-801