Comparison of toremifene and tamoxifen in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized double-blind, the 'nordic' phase III study

被引:85
作者
Pyrhonen, S
Valavaara, R
Modig, H
Pawlicki, M
Pienkowski, T
Gundersen, S
Bauer, J
Westman, G
Lundgren, S
Bianco, G
Mella, O
Nilsson, I
Hietanen, T
Hindy, I
Vuorinen, J
Hajba, A
机构
[1] TURKU UNIV, CENT HOSP, DEPT ONCOL, FIN-20520 TURKU, FINLAND
[2] UMEA REG HOSP, DEPT RADIOTHERAPY & ONCOL, S-90185 UMEA, SWEDEN
[3] MARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE MEM INST, DEPT MED ONCOL, PL-31115 KRAKOW, POLAND
[4] INST ONCOL, DEPT CHEMOTHERAPY, PL-02034 WARSAW, POLAND
[5] NORWEGIAN RADIUM HOSP, N-0310 OSLO, NORWAY
[6] CHARLES UNIV HOSP, PRAGUE 12808, CZECH REPUBLIC
[7] OREBRO REG HOSP, DEPT RADIOTHERAPY & ONCOL, S-70185 OREBRO, SWEDEN
[8] TRONDHEIM CENT HOSP, DEPT ONCOL, N-7006 TRONDHEIM, NORWAY
[9] OULU UNIV HOSP, DEPT RADIOTHERAPY & ONCOL, FIN-90220 OULU, FINLAND
[10] HAUKELAND HOSP, DEPT ONCOL, N-5016 HAUKELAND, NORWAY
[11] MALMO CENT HOSP, DEPT RADIOTHERAPY & ONCOL, S-21401 MALMO, SWEDEN
[12] TAMPERE UNIV HOSP, DEPT ONCOL, FIN-36280 PIKONLINNA, FINLAND
[13] NATL INST ONCOL, H-1122 BUDAPEST, HUNGARY
[14] ORION CORP FARMOS PHARMACEUT, FIN-20101 TURKU, FINLAND
关键词
antioestrogen; post-menopausal women; advanced breast cancer;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1997.375
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The study was planned to compare, in a prospective double-blind randomized trial, the efficacy and safety of toremifene (TOR) and tamoxifen (TAM) in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who have not had prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. Four hundred and fifteen post-menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive or ER-unknown advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive daily either 60 mg TOR or 40 mg TAM. The patients were stratified to measurable and non-measurable but evaluable groups. They were assessed for response to therapy, time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF), response duration, overall survival and drug toxicity. Two hundred and fourteen patients were randomized into TOR and 201 into TAM treatment. The response rate (complete + partial) was 31.3% for TOR and 37.3% for TAM (P = 0.215). The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the 6% difference was -15.1% to 3.1%. The median TTP was 7.3 months for TOR and 10.2 months for TAM (P = 0.047). The 95% CI for the hazard ratio of 0.80 was 0.64-1.00. A percentage of the TOR patients (9.8%) and the TAM patients (18.9%) discontinued the treatment prematurely (P = 0.011) for various reasons. Consequently, the median TTF of 6.3 vs 8.5 months did not differ significantly (P = 0.271). The hazard ratio was 0.89 and the subsequent 95% CI 0.73-1.09. The median overall survival was 33.0 months for TOR and 38.7 months for TBM (P = 0.645). The hazard ratio was 0.94 with 95% CI of 0.73-1.22. The transient difference in TTP may be related to an imbalance in ER content of the tumours. When only patients with ER-positive tumours were considered (n = 238), no difference between two treatments was seen (P = 0.578). TAM was associated with an overall slightly higher frequency of adverse drug reactions than TOR (44.3 vs 39.3%) and a higher discontinuation rate due to these events (3.5% vs 0.9%). Treatment-emerged moderate dizziness (P = 0.026) and cataracts (P = 0.026) were more frequent among TAM than among TOR patients. In conclusion, TOR (60 mg day(-1)) and TAM (40 mg day(-1)) are equally effective and safe in the treatment of advanced post-menopausal ER-positive or ER-unknown breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 277
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1992, LANCET, V339, P71
[2]  
BONOMI P, 1988, SEMIN ONCOL, V15, P26
[3]  
DeGregorio M W, 1995, Important Adv Oncol, P175
[4]   ENDOMETRIAL CANCER IN TAMOXIFEN-TREATED BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS - FINDINGS FROM THE NATIONAL SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST AND BOWEL PROJECT (NSABP) B-14 [J].
FISHER, B ;
COSTANTINO, JP ;
REDMOND, CK ;
FISHER, ER ;
WICKERHAM, DL ;
CRONIN, WM ;
BOWMAN, D ;
COUTURE, J ;
DIMITROV, NV ;
EVANS, J ;
FARRAR, W ;
KAVANAH, M ;
LICKLEY, HL ;
MARGOLESE, R ;
PATERSON, AHG ;
ROBIDOUX, A ;
SHIBATA, H ;
TERZ, J .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (07) :527-537
[5]   DESCRIPTIVE CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF 17 PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER DURING OR AFTER ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN IN EARLY BREAST-CANCER [J].
FORNANDER, T ;
HELLSTROM, AC ;
MOBERGER, B .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (22) :1850-1855
[6]  
GERNER EW, 1989, ANN OPHTHALMOL, V21, P420
[7]   PHASE-I STUDY OF TOREMIFENE IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CANCER [J].
HAMM, JT ;
TORMEY, DC ;
KOHLER, PC ;
HALLER, D ;
GREEN, M ;
SHEMANO, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (11) :2036-2041
[8]  
HAN XL, 1992, CANCER RES, V52, P1360
[9]  
HARD GC, 1993, CANCER RES, V53, P4534
[10]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TAMOXIFEN AND 2 SEPARATE DOSES OF TOREMIFENE IN POSTMENOPAUSAL PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER [J].
HAYES, DF ;
VANZYL, JA ;
HACKING, A ;
GOEDHALS, L ;
BEZWODA, WR ;
MAILLIARD, JA ;
JONES, SE ;
VOGEL, CL ;
BERRIS, RF ;
SHEMANO, I ;
SCHOENFELDER, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (10) :2556-2566