Lung cancer screening: Minimum tube current required for helical CT

被引:61
作者
Itoh, S
Ikeda, M
Arahata, S
Kodaira, T
Isomura, T
Kato, T
Yamakawa, K
Maruyama, K
Ishigaki, T
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Showa Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4660065, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Informat & Med Records, Showa Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4660065, Japan
[3] Natl Inst Longev Sci, Dept Biofunct Res, Oubu, Japan
[4] Tosei Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seto, Japan
关键词
cancer screening; computed tomography (CT); helical; image quality; lung neoplasms; CT; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap16175
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the minimum tube current required for helical computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty helical scans of the lung were obtained at effective tube currents of 50, 30, 20, 18, 12, 10, and 6 mAs in seven healthy volunteers. Computer-generated nodules 6 mm in diameter that showed ground-glass opacity were superimposed on the images. The image quality and detectability of nodules were evaluated subjectively by six observers. The SDs of measured CT numbers were calculated. The results were analyzed according to location in the lung. RESULTS: Compared with the subjective quality of images obtained at 50 mAs, the subjective quality of images obtained at 20 mAs was not significantly different. The detectability of nodules was not significantly degraded by reducing the tube current to 20 mAs in the upper zone of the lung, to 12 mAs in the middle zone, or to 18 mAs in the lower zone. The SDs at the apex and base of the lung were larger than those at other levels, and the difference became greater as the dose was reduced. CONCLUSION: The minimum tube current required for screening helical CT differs for different locations in the lu ng. An ideal CT protocol for the lu ng should perm it the tube current to be changed during helical scanning.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 183
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   PULMONARY NODULES - EFFECT OF INCREASED DATA SAMPLING ON DETECTION WITH SPIRAL CT AND CONFIDENCE IN DIAGNOSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JA ;
SCOTT, WW ;
SIEGELMAN, SS ;
KUHLMAN, JE ;
URBAN, BA ;
BLUEMKE, DA ;
FISHMAN, EK .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) :395-400
[2]  
FONTANA RS, 1991, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V67, P1155, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4+<1155::AID-CNCR2820671509>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-0
[4]   THE EFFECT OF MAS VARIATION UPON COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IMAGE QUALITY AS EVALUATED BY INVIVO AND INVITRO STUDIES [J].
HAAGA, JR ;
MIRALDI, F ;
MACINTYRE, W ;
LIPUMA, JP ;
BRYAN, PJ ;
WIESEN, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 138 (02) :449-454
[5]  
Itoh S, 1998, Radiat Med, V16, P75
[6]  
Itoh Shigeki, 1996, Nippon Acta Radiologica, V56, P961
[7]   Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: Focal area of ground-glass attenuation at thin-section CT as an early sign [J].
Jang, HJ ;
Lee, KS ;
Kwon, OJ ;
Rhee, CH ;
Shim, YM ;
Han, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (02) :485-488
[8]   Peripheral lung cancer: Screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography [J].
Kaneko, M ;
Eguchi, K ;
Ohmatsu, H ;
Kakinuma, R ;
Naruke, T ;
Suemasu, K ;
Moriyama, N .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) :798-802
[9]   Radiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: Physician's hand dose and development of needle holders [J].
Kato, R ;
Katada, K ;
Anno, H ;
Suzuki, S ;
Ida, Y ;
Koga, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (02) :576-578
[10]   SURGICALLY CURABLE EARLY ADENOCARCINOMA IN THE PERIPHERY OF THE LUNG [J].
KUROKAWA, T ;
MATSUNO, Y ;
NOGUCHI, M ;
MIZUNO, S ;
SHIMOSATO, Y .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 18 (05) :431-438