When Less is More: A Short Version of the Personal Optimism Scale and the Self-Efficacy Optimism Scale

被引:35
作者
Gavrilov-Jerkovic, Vesna [1 ]
Jovanovic, Veljko [1 ]
Zuljevic, Dragan [1 ]
Brdaric, Dragana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Dept Psychol, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
关键词
POSO-E; Positive expectancies; Personal optimism; Self-efficacy optimism; Reliability; Validity; CONNOR-DAVIDSON RESILIENCE; PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS; POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; FIT INDEXES; HOPE; EXPECTANCY; VALIDATION; CONSTRUCT; BELIEFS; ESTEEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10902-013-9432-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The past few years have seen increased theoretical and applied research on the relations between constructs related to positive expectations. However, instruments capable of distinguishing positive expectancy constructs are still lacking. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the 18-item Personal Optimism Scale and Self-Efficacy Optimism Scale. Two student samples from the University of Novi Sad in Serbia were recruited for the present research, with a total of 728 participants. The results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses did not support the theoretically expected structure. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis and content validity support shortening the scale to 9 items. The short versions of the scales demonstrated adequate reliability in internal consistency and adequate concurrent and convergent validity by significant correlations with dispositional optimism, general self-efficacy, hope, resilience and subjective well-being. The analyses lead us to conclude that a shorter 4-item Personal Optimism Scale and a 5-item Self-Efficacy Optimism Scale provide a clear, precise measures of two types of positive expectations. The authors argue that the limitations of the original scales emanate from their vague theoretical-substantive validity, and call for future research to replicate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 474
页数:20
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Great expectations: A meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope [J].
Alarcon, Gene M. ;
Bowling, Nathan A. ;
Khazon, Steven .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2013, 54 (07) :821-827
[2]  
[Anonymous], SRPSKI INVENTA UNPUB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Society and the adolescent selfimage, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400876136
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HDB ED PSYCHOL
[5]  
Aspinwall LG, 2002, PSYCHOL INQ, V13, P276
[6]  
Bandura A., 1986, Social Foundations of Thought andAction: ASocialCognitive Theory
[7]  
Bandura A, 1997, Self -Efficacy: The Exercise of Control
[8]  
Benson J., 1998, ED MEASUREMENT, V17, P10, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1998.TB00616.X
[9]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[10]  
Brewin C.R., 1988, COGNITIVE FDN CLIN P