Use of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) in the short-term management of headache

被引:30
作者
Ahmed, HE [1 ]
White, PF [1 ]
Craig, WF [1 ]
Hamza, MA [1 ]
Ghoname, ESA [1 ]
Gajraj, NM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Eugene McDermott Ctr Pain Management, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2000年 / 40卷 / 04期
关键词
tension-type headache; migraine; posttraumatic headache; percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; PENS; electroanalgesia;
D O I
10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00046.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective.-To evaluate the short-term effects of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) in the management of three types of chronic headache. Background.-Traditional electroanalgesic therapies have been reported to be effective in the management of acute headache symptoms. However, no controlled studies have been performed in patients with chronic headache. Methods.-Thirty patients with either tension headache, migraine, or posttraumatic headache symptoms of at least 6 months' duration were randomized to receive PENS (needles with electricity) or "needles alone" according to a crossover study design. All treatments were administered for 30 minutes, three times a week for 2 consecutive weeks with 1 week off between the two different treatments. For the PENS treatments, an alternating electrical stimulation frequency of 15 and 30 Hz was used. Pain, activity, and sleep scores were assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale, with 0 corresponding to the best and 10 to the worst, during the 48-hour period prior to the beginning of the two treatments, immediately before and after each treatment session, and 48 hours after completing each treatment modality. Results.-Compared with the needles alone, PENS therapy was significantly more effective in decreasing the overall VAS pain scores for tension-type headache, migraine and posttraumatic headache (58%, 59%, and 52% versus 20%, 15%, and 20%, respectively). Similarly, PENS therapy produced greater improvement in the patients' physical activity (41% to 58% for PENS versus 11% to 21% for needles only) and quality of sleep (41% to 48% for PENS versus 12% to 20% for needles only). However, there were no differences in the pattern of the response to PENS therapy among the three headache groups. Conclusions.-Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation appears to be a useful complementary therapy to analgesic and antimigraine drugs for the short-term management of headache. Interestingly, the analgesic response to PENS therapy appears to be independent of the origin of the headache symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 315
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
CEDERCREUTZ C, 1976, INT J CLIN EXP HYP, V24, P195, DOI 10.1080/00207147608405607
[2]  
CHEN XH, 1992, EUR J PHARMACOL, V211, P203
[3]  
Costantini D., 1997, Annali Italiani di Chirurgia, V68, P505
[4]   OVER-THE-COUNTER DRUGS - THE ISSUES [J].
CRANZ, H .
DRUG SAFETY, 1990, 5 :120-125
[5]   THE VALUE OF BIOFEEDBACK IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC HEADACHE - A 4-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY [J].
DIAMOND, S ;
MONTROSE, D .
HEADACHE, 1984, 24 (01) :5-18
[6]   HEADACHE AND CERVICAL-SPINE DISORDERS - CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT WITH TRANS-CUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION [J].
FARINA, S ;
GRANELLA, F ;
MALFERRARI, G ;
MANZONI, GC .
HEADACHE, 1986, 26 (08) :431-433
[7]   The effect of stimulus frequency on the analgesic response to percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain [J].
Ghoname, EA ;
Craig, WF ;
White, PF ;
Ahmed, HE ;
Hamza, MA ;
Gajraj, NM ;
Vakharia, AS ;
Noe, CE .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04) :841-846
[8]   Use of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) for treating ECT-induced headaches [J].
Ghoname, ESA ;
Craig, WF ;
White, PF .
HEADACHE, 1999, 39 (07) :502-505
[9]   EFFECT OF LOW-FREQUENCY AND HIGH-FREQUENCY TENS ON MET-ENKEPHALIN-ARG-PHE AND DYNORPHIN-A IMMUNOREACTIVITY IN HUMAN LUMBAR CSF [J].
HAN, JS ;
CHEN, XH ;
SUN, SL ;
XU, XJ ;
YUAN, Y ;
YAN, SC ;
HAO, JX ;
TERENIUS, L .
PAIN, 1991, 47 (03) :295-298
[10]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PHYSICAL THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC DAILY HEADACHES [J].
JAY, GW ;
BRUNSON, J ;
BRANSON, SJ .
HEADACHE, 1989, 29 (03) :156-162