Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: Three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies

被引:86
作者
Gilon, D
Cape, EG
Handschumacher, MD
Song, JK
Solheim, J
VanAuker, M
King, MEE
Levine, RA
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Cardiac Ultrasound Lab, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med & Engn, Childrens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Santin Engn, Peabody, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02269-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study tested the hypothesis that the impact of a stenotic aortic valve depends not only on the cross-sectional area of its limiting orifice but also on three-dimensional (3D) valve geometry. BACKGROUND Valve shape can potentially affect the hemodynamic impact of aortic stenosis by altering the ratio of effective to anatomic orifice area (the coefficient of orifice contraction [Cc]). For a given flow rate and anatomic area, a lower Cc increases velocity and pressure gradient. This effect has been recognized in mitral stenosis but assumed to be absent in aortic stenosis (constant Cc of 1 in the Gorlin equation). METHODS In order to study this effect with actual valve shapes in patients, 3D echocardiography was used to reconstruct a typical spectrum of stenotic aortic valve geometrics from doming to flat. Three different shapes were reproduced as actual models by stereolithography (computerized laser polymerization) with orifice areas of 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 cm(2) (total of nine valves) and studied with physiologic flows. To determine whether valve shape actually influences hemodynamics in the clinical setting, we also related Cc (= continuity/planimeter areas) to stenotic aortic valve shape in 35 patients with high-quality echocardiograms. RESULTS In the patient-derived 3D models, Cc varied prominently with valve shape, and was largest for long, tapered domes that allow more gradual flow convergence compared with more steeply converging flat valves (0.85 to 0.90 vs. 0.71 to 0.76). These variations translated into differences of up to 40% in pressure drop for the same anatomic area and flow rate, with corresponding variations in Gorlin (effective) area relative to anatomic values. In patients, Cc was significantly lower for flat versus doming bicuspid valves (0.73 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.94 +/- 0.14, p < 0.0001) with 40 +/- 5% higher gradients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional valve shape is an important determinant of pressure loss in patients with aortic stenosis, with smaller effective areas and higher pressure gradients for flatter valves. This effect can translate into clinically important differences between planimeter and effective valve areas (continuity or Gorlin). Therefore, valve shape provides additional information beyond the planimeter orifice area in determining the impact of valvular aortic stenosis on patient hemodynamics. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2002-,40:1479-86). (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1479 / 1486
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]
3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING OF THE ATRIAL SEPTUM - NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY [J].
BELOHLAVEK, M ;
FOLEY, DA ;
GERBER, TC ;
GREENLEAF, JF ;
SEWARD, JB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (06) :1673-1678
[2]
Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis [J].
Bernard, Y ;
Meneveau, N ;
Vuillemenot, A ;
Magnin, D ;
Anguenot, T ;
Schiele, F ;
Bassand, JP .
HEART, 1997, 78 (01) :68-73
[3]
Stereolithographic biomodeling to create tangible hard copies of cardiac structures from echocardiographic data - In vitro and in vivo validation [J].
Binder, TM ;
Moertl, D ;
Mundigler, G ;
Rehak, G ;
Franke, M ;
Delle-Karth, G ;
Mohl, W ;
Baumgartner, H ;
Maurer, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (01) :230-237
[4]
Buck T, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P4286
[5]
HYDRAULIC ESTIMATION OF STENOTIC ORIFICE AREA - A CORRECTION OF THE GORLIN FORMULA [J].
CANNON, SR ;
RICHARDS, KL ;
CRAWFORD, M .
CIRCULATION, 1985, 71 (06) :1170-1178
[6]
CARABELLO BA, 1991, CARDIAC CATHETERIZAT, P52
[7]
MODIFIED ORIFICE EQUATION FOR CALCULATION OF MITRAL-VALVE AREA [J].
COHEN, MV ;
GORLIN, R .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1972, 84 (06) :839-&
[8]
COLLINS SM, 1988, ECHOCARDIOGR-J CARD, V5, P311
[9]
DABOIN NP, 1990, SURG HEART VALVE DIS, P57
[10]
DAUGHERTY RL, 1985, FLUDI MECH ENG APPL, P399