A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area

被引:698
作者
Kitamura, R
Mokhtarian, PL
Laidet, L
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS,DEPT CIVIL & ENVIRONM ENGN,DAVIS,CA 95616
[2] UNIV CALIF DAVIS,INST TRANSPORTAT STUDIES,DAVIS,CA 95616
[3] KYOTO UNIV,DEPT TRANSPORTAT ENGN,KYOTO 606,JAPAN
关键词
attitude - behavior relationships; land use; traditional neighborhood developments; travel behavior;
D O I
10.1023/A:1017959825565
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study examined the effects of land use and attitudinal characteristics on travel behavior for five diverse San Francisco Bay Area neighborhoods. First, socio-economic and neighborhood characteristics were regressed against number and proportion of trips by various modes. The best models for each measure of travel behavior confirmed that neighborhood characteristics add significant explanatory power when socio-economic differences are controlled for. Specifically, measures of residential density, public transit accessibility, mixed land use, and the presence of sidewalks are significantly associated with trip generation by mode and modal split. Second, 39 attitude statements relating to urban life were factor analyzed into eight factors: pro-environment, pro-transit, suburbanite, automotive mobility, time pressure, urban villager, TCM, and workaholic. Scores on these factors were introduced into the six best models discussed above. The relative contributions of the socio-economic, neighborhood, and attitudinal blocks of variables were assessed. While each block of variables offers some significant explanatory power to the models, the attitudinal variables explained the highest proportion of the variation in the data. The finding that attitudes are more strongly associated with travel than are land use characteristics suggests that land use policies promoting higher densities and mixtures may not alter travel demand materially unless residents' attitudes are also changed.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 158
页数:34
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alonso, 2013, LOCATION LAND USE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Transportation Research Record
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, How land use patterns affect travel patterns: A bibliography
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, AM SUBURBAN CTR LAND
[5]   STRUCTURAL MODELS FOR ANALYSIS OF TRAVELER ATTITUDE-BEHAVIOR RELATIONSHIPS [J].
DOBSON, R ;
REIBSTEIN, D ;
LOVELOCK, C ;
DUNBAR, F ;
SMITH, CJ .
TRANSPORTATION, 1978, 7 (04) :351-363
[6]  
Ewing R., 1994, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1466, P53
[7]  
Frank L. D., 1994, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, V1466, P44
[8]   RESEARCH POLICY AND REVIEW .27. NEW DIRECTIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING TRANSPORTATION AND LAND-USE [J].
GIULIANO, G .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1989, 21 (02) :145-159
[9]  
Goodwin PB, 1975, PLANN TRANSP RES COM
[10]   THE COMMUTING PARADOX - EVIDENCE FROM THE TOP 20 [J].
GORDON, P ;
RICHARDSON, HW ;
JUN, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1991, 57 (04) :416-420