Cognitive status does not predict motor gain from post stroke constraint-induced movement therapy

被引:5
作者
Boe, Ellen Wichard [1 ]
Pedersen, Anders Degn [2 ]
Pedersen, Asger Roer [1 ]
Nielsen, Jorgen Feldbaek [1 ]
Blicher, Jakob Udby [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hammel Neurorehabil & Res Ctr, DK-8450 Hammel, Denmark
[2] Vejlefjord Ctr Rehabil, Stouby, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Ctr Functionally Integrat Neurosci, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, MINDLab, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Constraint-induced movement therapy; stroke; rehabilitation; neuropsychological assessment; cognition; upper extremity; CI THERAPY; HEMIPARESIS; OUTCOMES; EXCITE;
D O I
10.3233/NRE-131011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) is an evidence-based rehabilitation intervention for stroke. Several factors influence the motor gain from CIMT, including age and level of impairment. However, it is currently unknown to what extent cognitive status affects motor gain during CIMT. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether cognitive and emotional status affects motor improvement during two weeks of CIMT and retention of the gain at three months follow-up. METHODS: Twenty stroke patients (3-12 months post stroke) completed two weeks of CIMT. Motor performance was measured using the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). Cognitive and emotional status was measured with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and a questionnaire on emotional status. All measures were performed at baseline, after two weeks of training, and at three months follow-up. RESULTS: We found no significant correlation between cognitive or emotional measures at baseline and improvement in motor performance post training. Also, cognitive and emotional status did not correlate with motor retention at three months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support that cognitive performance in stroke patients can predict motor gain from CIMT.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 207
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2004, SAS ONLINEDOC
[2]
Culbertson W. C., 2005, TOWER LONDON DREXEL
[3]
DEROGATIS L R, 1973, Psychopharmacology Bulletin, V9, P13
[4]
Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: Lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials [J].
Dobkin, Bruce H. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2007, 21 (01) :3-13
[5]
Detecting mental disorders in general hospitals by the SCL-8 scale [J].
Fink, P ;
Ornbol, E ;
Hansen, MS ;
Sondergaard, L ;
De Jonge, P .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2004, 56 (03) :371-375
[6]
Descriptive characteristics as potential predictors of outcomes following constraint-induced movement therapy for people after stroke [J].
Fritz, SL ;
Light, KE ;
Clifford, SN ;
Patterson, TS ;
Behrman, AL ;
Davis, SB .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 86 (06) :825-832
[7]
Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke [J].
Fritz, SL ;
Light, KE ;
Patterson, TS ;
Behrman, AL ;
Davis, SB .
STROKE, 2005, 36 (06) :1172-1177
[8]
Kaplan E. F., 1983, The Boston naming test, V2nd ed.
[9]
The modified Location Learning Test: Norms for the assessment of spatial memory function in neuropsychological patients [J].
Kessels, Roy P. C. ;
Nys, Gudrun M. S. ;
Brands, Augustina M. A. ;
van den Berg, Esther ;
Van Zandvoort, Martine J. E. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 21 (08) :841-846
[10]
Lezak M.D., 2012, Neuropsychological Assessment