Could treatments with beta-blockers be associated with a reduction in cancer risk?

被引:66
作者
Algazi, M
Plu-Bureau, G
Flahault, A
Dondon, MG
Lê, MG
机构
[1] Hop Prive Diaconesses, Serv Cardiol & Med Interne, F-75012 Paris, France
[2] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Serv Endocrinol & Med Reprod, F-75743 Paris 15, France
[3] Univ Paris 06, INSERM, U444, F-75571 Paris 12, France
[4] Inst Gustave Roussy, INSERM, XU 521, F-94805 Villejuif 01, France
来源
REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2004年 / 52卷 / 01期
关键词
beta-blockers; cancer; cohort study;
D O I
10.1016/S0398-7620(04)99022-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
Background: The relationship between the use of anti-hypertensive drugs and cancer risk remains controversial. The main objective of this study was to assess the potential effect of beta-blocker use on cancer risk. Methods: In a cohort of 839 patients with cardiovascular disease, followed up prospectively for an average period of 10 years, cancer occurrence was recorded according to the exposure to beta-blockers. The relative risk of cancer associated with beta-blocker use was estimated using a Cox model adjusted on gender and age. Ever- vs never-use of beta-blockers and duration of exposure to the drug were analyzed as time-dependent variables. In addition, the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated using the corresponding age- and gender-adjusted cancer incidences in the French general population. Results: A total of 326 beta-blocker users and 513 users of other treatments were included in the cohort. During the follow-up period, representing 8,466 person-years, incident cancer cases were 15 and 59 in beta-blocker ever-users versus never-users, respectively. Using the Cox model, the overall relative risk of cancer was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.29-0.90) in the beta-blocker ever-users versus never-users (p = 0.02), with a 6% decrease per year of use (95% CI: 1%-12%; p = 0.03). The corresponding SIR ratio between these two groups was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.24-0.76). Conclusion: In this cohort, the beta-blocker treatments appeared to decrease the cancer risk significantly. However, this result should be considered with caution; further work is needed, as some sources of bias associated with this type of epidemiological study cannot be totally excluded.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 65
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Suppression of NK cell activity and of resistance to metastasis by stress:: A role for adrenal catecholamines and β-adrenoceptors [J].
Ben-Eliyahu, S ;
Shakhar, G ;
Page, GG ;
Stefanski, V ;
Shakhar, K .
NEUROIMMUNOMODULATION, 2000, 8 (03) :154-164
[2]
BOUYER J, 1996, EPIDEMIOLOGIE PRINCI, P327
[3]
Stimulation of anion secretion by beta-adrenoceptors in the mouse endometrial epithelium [J].
Chan, HC ;
Fong, SK ;
So, SC ;
Chung, YW ;
Wong, PYD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1997, 501 (03) :517-525
[4]
Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics - Implications for drug therapy [J].
Cheymol, G .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2000, 39 (03) :215-231
[5]
Increased emotional distress in daughters of breast cancer patients is associated with decreased natural cytotoxic activity, elevated levels of stress hormones and decreased secretion of Th1 cytokines [J].
Cohen, M ;
Klein, E ;
Kuten, A ;
Fried, G ;
Zinder, O ;
Pollack, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 100 (03) :347-354
[6]
RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS IN PRIMARY CARE [J].
COOPE, J ;
WARRENDER, TS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6555) :1145-1151
[7]
Antihypertensive therapy and cancer risk [J].
Felmeden, DC ;
Lip, GYH .
DRUG SAFETY, 2001, 24 (10) :727-739
[8]
CANCER MORTALITY AND ATENOLOL TREATMENT [J].
FLETCHER, AE ;
BEEVERS, DG ;
BULPITT, CJ ;
COLES, EC ;
DOLLERY, CT ;
LEDINGHAM, JG ;
PALMER, AJ ;
PETRIE, JC ;
WEBSTER, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6878) :622-623
[9]
Fourneret P, 2001, ENCEPHALE, V27, P578
[10]
Stressful life experiences and risk of relapse of breast cancer: observational cohort study [J].
Graham, J ;
Ramirez, A ;
Love, S ;
Richards, M ;
Burgess, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7351) :1420-1422