Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses

被引:94
作者
Imaoka, Izumi [1 ]
Wada, Akihiko
Kaji, Yasushi
Hayashi, Takafumi
Hayashi, Michiharu
Matsuo, Michimasa
Sugimura, Kazuro
机构
[1] Tenri Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nara, Japan
[2] Tenri Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nara, Japan
[3] Shimane Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
[4] Dokkyo Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan
[5] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1148/rg.265045206
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides useful information for characterization of various ovarian masses as neoplastic or nonneoplastic and, when neoplastic, on a spectrum from benign to malignant. The use of MR imaging for diagnosis of ovarian masses includes consideration of morphologic characteristics and signal intensity characteristics on T1- and T2-weighted images. The morphologic characteristics of cystic masses, cystic and solid masses, and predominantly solid masses provide important information. In general, cystic masses represent benign tumors, whereas cystic and solid masses are strongly associated with malignancy. Predominantly solid masses include benign, borderline malignant, and malignant tumors. T1- weighted images provide useful information for characterization because hemorrhagic adnexal masses (eg, endometriotic cyst) and cystic teratomas can be correctly diagnosed when the mass has high signal intensity. Significant low signal intensity in solid masses on T2-weighted images is indicative of fibrothecomas and Brenner tumors because extensive fibrous tissue produces significant low signal intensity on T2-weighted images. A strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses with MR imaging incorporates signal intensity characteristics into morphologic characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:1431 / 1448
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, BLAUSTEIN S PATHOLOG
[2]   Primary versus secondary ovarian malignancy: Imaging findings of adnexal masses in the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Study [J].
Brown, DL ;
Zou, KH ;
Tempany, CMC ;
Frates, MC ;
Silverman, SG ;
McNeil, BJ ;
Kurtz, AB .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) :213-218
[3]  
Clement P.B., 2002, BLAUSTEINS PATHOLOGY, P675
[4]  
Fukunaga M, 1998, MODERN PATHOL, V11, P784
[5]  
*GLOBOCAN, 2000, CANC INC MORT PREV W
[6]   DIAGNOSIS OF PELVIC ENDOMETRIOSIS - FAT-SUPPRESSED T1-WEIGHTED VS CONVENTIONAL MR-IMAGES [J].
HA, HK ;
LIM, YT ;
KIM, HS ;
SUH, TS ;
SONG, HH ;
KIM, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (01) :127-131
[7]  
HA HK, 1995, ACTA RADIOL, V36, P510
[8]   KRUKENBERGS TUMOR OF THE OVARY - MR-IMAGING FEATURES [J].
HA, HK ;
BAEK, SY ;
KIM, SH ;
KIM, HH ;
CHUNG, EC ;
YEON, KM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (06) :1435-1439
[9]   Complex adnexal masses: Detection and characterization with MR imaging - Multivariate analysis [J].
Hricak, H ;
Chen, M ;
Coakley, FV ;
Kinkel, K ;
Yu, KK ;
Sica, G ;
Bacchetti, P ;
Powell, CB .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) :39-46
[10]   OVARIAN CYSTIC TERATOMAS - VALUE OF CHEMICAL FAT-SATURATION MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
IMAOKA, I ;
SUGIMURA, K ;
OKIZUKA, H ;
IWANARI, O ;
KITAO, M ;
ISHIDA, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 66 (791) :994-997