Pedicle screws with high electrical resistance - A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG

被引:40
作者
Anderson, DG
Wierzbowski, LR
Schwartz, DM
Hilibrand, AS
Vaccaro, AR
Albert, TJ
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Surg Monitoring Associates, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Rothman Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
EMG; implant; lumbar; neurophysiology; pedicle; spine;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200207150-00018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Clinically relevant aspects of pedicle screws were subjected to electrical resistance testing. Objectives. To catalog commonly used pedicle screws in terms of electrical resistance, and to determine whether polyaxial-type pedicle screws have the potential to create a high-resistance circuit during stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing. Summary of Background Data. Although stimulus-evoked electromyography is commonly used to confirm the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, no studies have documented the electrical resistance of commonly used pedicle screws. Methods. Resistance measurements were obtained from eight pedicle screw varieties (5 screws of each type) across the screw shank and between the shank and regions of the screw that would be clinically accessible to stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing with a screw implanted in a pedicle. To determine measurement variability, resistance was measured three times at each site and with the crown of the polyaxial-type screw in three random positions. Results. Resistance across the screw shank ranged from 0 to 36.4 ohms, whereas resistance across the length of the monoaxial-type screws ranged from 0.1 to 31.8 ohms. Resistance between the hexagonal port and shank of polyaxial-type screws varied widely, ranging from 0.1 ohms to an open circuit (no electrical conduction). Polyaxial-type screws demonstrated an open circuit in 28 of 75 measurements (37%) and a high-resistance circuit (exceeding 1000 ohms) in 5 of 75 measurements (7%). Conclusions. Polyaxial-type pedicle screws have the potential for high electrical resistance between the mobile crown and shank, and therefore may fail to demonstrate an electromyographic response during stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing in the setting of a pedicle breech. To avoid false-negative stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing, the cathode stimulator probe should be applied to the hexagonal port or directly to the screw shank, and not to the mobile crown.
引用
收藏
页码:1577 / 1581
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Safety and efficacy of pedicle screw placement for adult spinal deformity with a pedicle-probing conventional anatomic technique [J].
Boachie-Adjei, O ;
Girardi, FP ;
Bansal, M ;
Rawlins, BA .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2000, 13 (06) :496-500
[2]
INTRAOPERATIVE EVOKED EMG MONITORING IN AN ANIMAL-MODEL - A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR EVALUATING PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT [J].
CALANCIE, B ;
LEBWOHL, N ;
MADSEN, P ;
KLOSE, KJ .
SPINE, 1992, 17 (10) :1229-1235
[3]
STIMULUS-EVOKED EMG MONITORING DURING TRANSPEDICULAR LUMBOSACRAL SPINE INSTRUMENTATION - INITIAL CLINICAL-RESULTS [J].
CALANCIE, B ;
MADSEN, P ;
LEBWOHL, N .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (24) :2780-2786
[4]
Evoked and spontaneous electromyography to evaluate lumbosacral pedicle screw placement [J].
Clements, DH ;
Morledge, DE ;
Martin, WH ;
Betz, RR .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (05) :600-604
[5]
COSCIA MF, 1995, J SPINAL DISORD, V8, P451
[6]
A comparison of impedance and electromyogram measurements in detecting the presence of pedicle wall breakthrough [J].
Darden, BV ;
Owen, JH ;
Hatley, MK ;
Kostuik, J ;
Tooke, SM .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (02) :256-262
[7]
Anatomic relations between the lumbar pedicle and the adjacent neural structures [J].
Ebraheim, NA ;
Xu, RM ;
Darwich, M ;
Yeasting, RA .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (20) :2338-2341
[8]
Ecker ML, 1996, J SPINAL DISORD, V9, P159
[9]
ESSES SI, 1992, ORTHOP T, V16, P160
[10]
SPECIFIC RESISTANCE OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL-A COMPENDUM OF DATA FOR BIOMEDICAL ENGINEER AND PHYSIOLOGIST [J].
GEDDES, LA ;
BAKER, LE .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1967, 5 (03) :271-&