Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Capacity in Arizona

被引:12
作者
Benuzillo, Jose G. [2 ]
Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
Hoffman, Richard M. [3 ]
Heigh, Russell I. [4 ]
Lance, Peter [1 ]
Martinez, Maria Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Arizona Canc Ctr, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Med, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84148 USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Sch Med, Dept Med, New Mexico VA Hlth Care Syst, Albuquerque, NM 87108 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Capacity; Rural health; Urban health; UNITED-STATES; NATIONAL-SURVEY; OLDER-ADULTS; COLONOSCOPY; PHYSICIANS; RISK; SURVEILLANCE; POLYPECTOMY; KNOWLEDGE; POLYPS;
D O I
10.1007/s10900-009-9185-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Colorectal cancer can be prevented via screening by the detection and removal of colorectal adenomas. Few data exist on screening capacity by rural/urban areas. Therefore, the aims of this work were to evaluate current colorectal cancer endoscopy screening capacity and to estimate potential volume for rural and urban regions in Arizona. Gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons practicing in Arizona completed a survey (n = 105) that assessed current colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy screening and estimated future capacity. Resources needed to increase capacity were identified, and differences between rural and urban regions were examined. Responders were more likely to practice in an urban region (89.5%). Physicians reported performing 8,717 endoscopic procedures weekly (8,312 in urban and 405 in rural regions) and the vast majority were colonoscopies (91% in urban and 97% in rural regions). Urban physicians estimated being able to increase their capacity by 35.7% (95% confidence interval 34.7-35.7) whereas rural physicians estimated an increase of 53.1% (95% confidence interval 48.1-58.0). The most commonly cited resource needed to increase capacity was a greater number of physicians in urban regions (52.1%); while the top response in rural areas was appropriate compensation (54.6%). Lastly, 27.3% of rural physicians noted they did not need additional resources to increase their capacity. In conclusion, Arizona has the ability to expand colorectal cancer screening endoscopic capacity; this potential increase was more pronounced in rural as compared to urban regions.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 528
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2007, 2007 STRAT PLAN PROG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Cancer Facts Figures 2008
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SAS STAT VERS 9 1 3
[6]  
*AZ DEP HLTH SERV, 2007, AR BEH RISK FACT SUR
[7]  
*AZ DEP HLTH SERV, 2007, CANC AR CANC INC MOR
[8]   Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults [J].
Berkowitz, Zahava ;
Hawkins, Nikki A. ;
Peipins, Lucy A. ;
White, Mary C. ;
Nadel, Marion R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2008, 56 (02) :307-314
[9]   Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States [J].
Beydoun, Hind A. ;
Beydoun, May A. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2008, 19 (04) :339-359
[10]   Colorectal screening after polypectomy: A national survey study of primary care physicians [J].
Boolchand, Vikram ;
Olds, Gregory ;
Singh, Joseph ;
Singh, Pankaj ;
Chak, Amitabh ;
Cooper, Gregory S. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (09) :654-659