Understanding and evaluating qualitative research

被引:911
作者
Fossey, E [1 ]
Harvey, C
McDermott, F
Davidson, L
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Occupat Therapy, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Psychiat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Sch Social Work, Mental Hlth Practice Res Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
qualitative evidence; qualitative method; research appraisal;
D O I
10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Qualitative research aims to address questions concerned with developing an understanding of the meaning and experience dimensions of humans' lives and social worlds. Central to good qualitative research is whether the research participants' subjective meanings, actions and social contexts, as understood by them, are illuminated. This paper aims to provide beginning researchers, and those unfamiliar with qualitative research, with an orientation to the principles that inform the evaluation of the design, conduct, findings and interpretation of qualitative research. It orients the reader to two philosophical perspectives, the interpretive and critical research paradigms, which underpin both the qualitative research methodologies most often used in mental health research, and how qualitative research is evaluated. Criteria for evaluating quality are interconnected with standards for ethics in qualitative research. They include principles for good practice in the conduct of qualitative research, and for trustworthiness in the interpretation of qualitative data. The paper reviews these criteria, and discusses how they may be used to evaluate qualitative research presented in research reports. These principles also offer some guidance about the conduct of sound qualitative research for the beginner qualitative researcher.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 732
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Handbook of research methods in health sciences
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Handbook of social functioning in schizophrenia
[3]  
Barrett Robert, 1996, The Psychiatric Team and the Social Definition of Schizophrenia: An Anthropological Study of Person and Illness
[4]   Qualitative research [J].
Buston, K ;
Parry-Jones, W ;
Livingston, M ;
Bogan, A ;
Wood, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 172 :197-199
[5]   Hospital or community living? Examining consumer perspectives on deinstitutionalization [J].
Davidson, L ;
Hoge, MA ;
Godleski, L ;
Rakfeldt, J ;
Griffith, EEH .
PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 1996, 19 (03) :49-58
[6]   THE EXPERIENCES OF LONG-STAY INPATIENTS RETURNING TO THE COMMUNITY [J].
DAVIDSON, L ;
HOGE, MA ;
MERRILL, ME ;
RAKFELDT, J ;
GRIFFITH, EEH .
PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1995, 58 (02) :122-132
[7]   Phenomenological and participatory research on schizophrenia: Recovering the person in theory and practice [J].
Davidson, L ;
Stayner, DA ;
Lambert, S ;
Smith, P ;
Sledge, WH .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1997, 53 (04) :767-784
[8]   It was just realizing ... That life isn't one big horror: A qualitative study of supported socialization [J].
Davidson, L ;
Haglund, KE ;
Stayner, DA ;
Rakfeldt, J ;
Chinman, MJ ;
Tebes, JK .
PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2001, 24 (03) :275-292
[9]  
Denzin N.K., 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, P500
[10]  
Drew N, 1993, Image J Nurs Sch, V25, P345