Impact of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus active surveillance program on contact precaution utilization in a surgical intensive care unit

被引:23
作者
Warren, David K.
Guth, Rebecca M.
Coopersmith, Craig M.
Merz, Liana R.
Zack, Jeanne E.
Fraser, Victoria J.
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Barnes Jewish Hosp, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Missouri Baptist Med Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
Staphylococcus aureus; methicillin resistance; infection control; intensive care unit; patient isolation; antimicrobial resistance;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000253813.98431.28
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective., To determine the impact of an active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on contact precaution utilization, as measured by additional number of contact precaution days attributable to the active surveillance program. Design. Prospective cohort study. Setting. Twenty-four-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Patients. All patients admitted to the surgical ICU. Interventions., Nasal cultures for MRSA were performed at admission to a surgical ICU for 19 months. Patients admitted >48 hrs also received weekly and discharge nasal cultures. Measurements and Main Results. Clinical data, including start date and initial indication for contact precautions, were prospectively collected. Of 1,893 admissions, 253 (13%) were found to be MRSA-positive during their ICU stay. One hundred forty-six (58%) were identified by nasal culture alone. Compared with the first 10 months of study, the prevalence of MRSA on admission to the ICU during the last 9 months of the study period significantly increased (7.2% vs. 11.4%, p <.001). Acquisition of MRSA by noncolonized patients remained constant between the first 10 months and last 9 months of study (7.0 vs. 5.5 cases per 1000 patient days, p =.29). Two hundred fourteen (6%) of 3461 total contact precaution days in the ICU were attributable to MRSA active surveillance. In sensitivity analyses, the implementation of rapid, same-day results for MRSA active surveillance would increase contact precaution days by 15% compared with no surveillance. If the total number of vancomycin-resistant enterococci patients in the ICU were reduced by 50%, the contact precaution days attributable to active surveillance would increase to 9%. Conclusions. MRSA active surveillance increased total contact precaution days in this ICU by 6% yet detected 58% of MRSA cases that would have been otherwise missed. Despite an increasing prevalence of MRSA on ad-mission to the ICU, the acquisition rate has remained constant.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 434
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The role of "colonization pressure" in the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci - An important infection control variable [J].
Bonten, MJM ;
Slaughter, S ;
Ambergen, AW ;
Hayden, MK ;
van Voorhis, J ;
Nathan, C ;
Weinstein, RA .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (10) :1127-1132
[2]   Infection control - A problem for patient safety [J].
Burke, JP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (07) :651-656
[3]   National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004 [J].
Cardo, D ;
Horan, T ;
Andrus, M ;
Dembinski, M ;
Edwards, J ;
Peavy, G ;
Tolson, J ;
Wagner, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2004, 32 (08) :470-485
[4]   Isolation of patients in single rooms or cohorts to reduce spread of MRSA in intensive-care units: prospective two-centre study [J].
Cepeda, JA ;
Whitehouse, T ;
Cooper, B ;
Hails, J ;
Jones, K ;
Kwaku, F ;
Taylor, L ;
Hayman, S ;
Cookson, B ;
Show, S ;
Kibbler, C ;
Singer, M ;
Bellingan, G ;
Wilson, APR .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9456) :295-304
[5]   Control of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus -: A cost-benefit analysis in an intensive care unit [J].
Chaix, C ;
Durand-Zaleski, I ;
Alberti, C ;
Brun-Buisson, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (18) :1745-1751
[6]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection [J].
Davis, KA ;
Stewart, JJ ;
Crouch, HK ;
Florez, CE ;
Hospenthal, DR .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (06) :776-782
[7]   Contact isolation in surgical patients: A barrier to care? [J].
Evans, HL ;
Shaffer, MM ;
Hughes, MG ;
Smith, RL ;
Chong, TW ;
Raymond, DP ;
Pelletier, SJ ;
Pruett, TL ;
Sawyer, RG .
SURGERY, 2003, 134 (02) :180-188
[8]  
*HOSP INF CONTR PR, 1996, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V24, P32
[9]  
Huskins WC, 2005, LANCET, V365, P273
[10]  
Jernigan JA, 1996, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V143, P496, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008770