The effects of learning and intention on the neural network involved in the perception of meaningless actions

被引:159
作者
Grèzes, J
Costes, N
Decety, J
机构
[1] INSERM, U280, F-69424 Lyon 03, France
[2] Hop Neurocardiol, Ctr Explorat & Rech Med Emmiss Positrons, Lyon, France
关键词
perception; intention; action; motor knowledge; PET;
D O I
10.1093/brain/122.10.1875
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PET was used to explore the neural network involved in the perception of meaningless action. In two conditions, subjects observed learned and unknown meaningless actions without any purpose, In two other conditions, subjects observed the same type of stimuli for later imitation. The control condition, which consisted of the presention of stationary hands, served as a baseline, Unsurprisingly, a common network that forms part of the dorsal pathway was engaged in all conditions when compared with stationary hands, and this was interpreted as being devoted to the analysis of hand movements. One of the most striking results of the present study was that some brain areas were strongly modulated by the learning level, independent of the subject's intention. Two different effects were observed: a reduced activity in posterior regions within the common network, which correlated with specific increases in the frontopolar area 10 and in the angular gyrus during the perception of learned meaningless actions compared with the perception of unknown actions. Finally, the major effect of the subject's intention to imitate was a strong increase in the dorsal pathway extending to the lateral premotor cortex and to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which reflects the information processing needed for prospective action. Overall, our results provide evidence for both an effect of the visuomotor learning Level and of the subject's intention on the neural network involved during the perception of human meaningless actions.
引用
收藏
页码:1875 / 1887
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1967, INTEGRATIVE ACTIVITY
[2]   MOTORIC AND SYMBOLIC MEDIATION IN OBSERVATIONAL-LEARNING [J].
BERGER, SM ;
CARLI, LL ;
HAMMERSLA, KS ;
KARSHMER, JF ;
SANCHEZ, ME .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (05) :735-746
[3]   The functional anatomy of attention to visual motion -: A functional MRI study [J].
Büchel, C ;
Josephs, O ;
Rees, G ;
Turner, R ;
Frith, CD ;
Friston, KJ .
BRAIN, 1998, 121 :1281-1294
[4]   What does neuroimaging tell us about the role of prefrontal cortex in memory retrieval? [J].
Buckner, RL ;
Petersen, SE .
SEMINARS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES, 1996, 8 (01) :47-55
[5]   Speed-dependent motion-sensitive responses in V5: An fMRI study [J].
Chawla, D ;
Phillips, J ;
Buechel, C ;
Edwards, R ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 7 (02) :86-96
[6]  
De Renzi E. A., 1989, HDB NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V2, P245
[7]   Brain activity during observation of actions - Influence of action content and subject's strategy [J].
Decety, J ;
Grezes, J ;
Costes, N ;
Perani, D ;
Jeannerod, M ;
Procyk, E ;
Grassi, F ;
Fazio, F .
BRAIN, 1997, 120 :1763-1777
[8]  
Decety J, 1996, REV NEUROSCIENCE, V7, P285
[9]  
DEIBER MP, 1991, EXP BRAIN RES, V84, P393
[10]   MANY AREAS IN THE HUMAN BRAIN RESPOND TO VISUAL-MOTION [J].
DUPONT, P ;
ORBAN, GA ;
DEBRUYN, B ;
VERBRUGGEN, A ;
MORTELMANS, L .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 72 (03) :1420-1424