Duration models for repeated events

被引:133
作者
Box-Steffensmeier, JM [1 ]
Zorn, C
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-2508.00163
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 [政治学]; 030201 [政治学理论];
摘要
An important feature of most political events is their repeatability: nearly all political events reoccur, and theories of learning, path dependence, and institutional change all suggest that later events will differ from earlier ones. Yet, most models for event history analysis fail to account for repeated events, a fact that can yield misleading results in practice. We present a class of duration models for analyzing repeated events, discuss their properties and implementation, and offer recommendations for their use by applied researchers. We illustrate these methods through an application to widely used data on international conflict.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1094
页数:26
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]
Andersen PK, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P1489, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990630)18:12<1489::AID-SIM140>3.0.CO
[2]
2-#
[3]
COX REGRESSION-MODEL FOR COUNTING-PROCESSES - A LARGE SAMPLE STUDY [J].
ANDERSEN, PK ;
GILL, RD .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1982, 10 (04) :1100-1120
[4]
[Anonymous], 1997, The politics of global governance:international organizations in an interdependent w o rld
[5]
Barai U, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P941
[6]
Globalization and peace: Assessing new directions in the study of trade and conflict [J].
Barbieri, K ;
Schneider, G .
JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (04) :387-404
[7]
Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable [J].
Beck, N ;
Katz, JN ;
Tucker, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 42 (04) :1260-1288
[8]
BECK N, 1998, RES STRATEGIES SOCIA
[9]
The duration of interstate wars, 1816-1985 [J].
Bennett, DS ;
Stam, AC .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1996, 90 (02) :239-257
[10]
The declining advantages of democracy - A combined model of war outcomes and duration [J].
Bennett, DS ;
Stam, AC .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1998, 42 (03) :344-366