Whole-pelvis, "mini-pelvis," or prostate-only external beam radiotherapy after neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy in patients treated in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413 trial

被引:155
作者
Roach, Mack, III
DeSilvio, Michelle
Valicenti, Richard
Grignon, David
Asbell, Sucha O.
Lawton, Colleen
Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
Shipley, William U.
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] RTOG Stat Headquarters, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[6] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
[8] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2006年 / 66卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; randomized trials; radiation field size;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.074
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9413 trial demonstrated a better progression-free survival (PFS) with whole-pelvis (WP) radiotherapy (RT) compared with prostate-only (PO) RT. This secondary analysis was undertaken to determine whether "mini-pelvis" (MP; defined as >= 10 x 11cm but < 11 x 11cm) RT resulted in progression-free survival (PFS) comparable to that of WP RT. To avoid a timing bias, this analysis was limited to patients receiving neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy (N&CHT) in Arms I and 2 of the study. Methods and Materials: Eligible patients had a risk of lymph node (LN) involvement > 15%. Neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy (N&CHT) was administered 2 months before and during RT for 4 months. From April 1, 1995, to June 1, 1999, a group of 325 patients were randomized to WP RT + N&CHT and another group of 324 patients were randomized to receive PO RT + N&CHT. Patients randomized to PO RT were dichotomized by median field size (10 x 11cm), with the larger field considered an "MP" field and the smaller a PO field. Results: The median PFS was 5.2, 3.7, and 2.9 years for WP, MP, and PO fields, respectively (p = 0.02). The 7-year PFS was 40%, 35%, and 27% for patients treated to WP, MP, and PO fields, respectively. There was no association between field size and late Grade 3+ genitourinary toxicity but late Grade 3+ gastrointestinal RT complications correlated with increasing field size. Conclusions: This subset analysis demonstrates that RT field size has a major impact on PFS, and the findings support comprehensive nodal treatment in patients with a risk of LN involvement of > 15%. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 653
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer - A randomized controlled trial [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Manola, J ;
Loffredo, M ;
Renshaw, AA ;
DellaCroce, A ;
Kantoff, PW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (07) :821-827
[2]
Short-term androgen deprivation and radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Results from the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.01 randomised controlled trial [J].
Denham, JW ;
Steigler, A ;
Lamb, DS ;
Joseph, D ;
Mameghan, H ;
Turner, S ;
Matthews, J ;
Franklin, I ;
Atkinson, C ;
North, J ;
Poulsen, M ;
Christie, D ;
Spry, NA ;
Tai, KH ;
Wynne, C ;
Duchesne, G ;
Kovacev, O ;
D'Este, C .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (11) :841-850
[3]
Uncertainties regarding pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Ennis, RD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (11) :2254-2255
[4]
A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates [J].
Foley, CL ;
Bott, SRJ ;
Thomas, K ;
Parkinson, MC ;
Kirby, RS .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (04) :370-374
[5]
Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: A search database study [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Isaacs, WB ;
Platz, EA ;
Terris, MK ;
Aronson, WJ ;
Amling, CL ;
Presti, JC ;
Kane, CJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) :7546-7554
[6]
Dose response in prostate cancer with 8-12 years' follow-up [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Epstein, B ;
Horwitz, EM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02) :427-435
[7]
Role of prostate dose escalation in patients with greater than 15% risk of pelvic lymph node involvement [J].
Jacob, R ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Movsas, B ;
Uzzo, RG ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :695-701
[8]
Kantoff PW, 2003, J UROLOGY, V170, pS40
[9]
Beneficial effect of combination hormonal therapy administered prior and following external beam radiation therapy in localized prostate cancer [J].
Laverdiere, J ;
Gomez, JL ;
Cusan, L ;
Suburu, ER ;
Diamond, P ;
Lemay, M ;
Candas, B ;
Fortin, A ;
Labrie, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (02) :247-252
[10]
Prostate cancer in a large prostate is associated with a decreased prostate specific antigen failure rate after brachytherapy [J].
Lehrer, S ;
Stone, NN ;
Stock, SG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (01) :79-81