Electric field properties of two commercial figure-8 coils in TMS: calculation of focality and efficiency

被引:206
作者
Thielscher, A
Kammer, T
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Psychiat 3, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Tuebingen, Cort Physiol Res Grp, Dept Neurol, Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; coil design; electric field properties; focality; efficiency;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.019
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare two commonly used TMS coils, namely the Medtronic MC-B70 double coil and the Magstim 70 mm double coil, with respect to their electric field distributions induced on the cortex. Methods: Electric field properties are calculated on a hemisphere representing the cortex using a spherical head model. The coil designs are characterised using several parameters, such as focality, efficiency and stimulation depth. Results: Medtronic and Magstim coils exhibit similar focality values and stimulation depths, despite very different coil designs. However, the Medtronic coil is about 1.2 times more efficient compared to the Magstim coil. This difference corresponds to different motor and visual phosphene thresholds obtained in previous physiological studies, thereby validating the chosen coil modelling approach. Focality of the Medtronic coil changed less with varying coil-cortex distance compared to the Magstim coil, whereas both coils exhibited similar dependencies on changes in cortex radius. Conclusions: The similar values for locality and stimulation depth indicate that both coil types should evoke similar physiological effects when adjusting for the different efficiencies. The different physiological thresholds of the two coils can be traced back to differences in coil design. Ideally, focality should depend neither on coil-cortex distance nor on cortex radius in order to allow for an inter-subject comparability. In particular, in motor mapping experiments the size of the resulting maps is affected by these two parameters. Consequently, they are at least partially the cause of the variability across subjects seen in these experiments. (C) 2004 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1697 / 1708
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Multimodal output mapping of human central motor representation on different spatial scales [J].
Classen, J ;
Knorr, U ;
Werhahn, KJ ;
Schlaug, G ;
Kunesch, E ;
Cohen, LG ;
Seitz, RJ ;
Benecke, R .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1998, 512 (01) :163-179
[2]   EFFECTS OF COIL DESIGN ON DELIVERY OF FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION - TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
COHEN, LG ;
ROTH, BJ ;
NILSSON, J ;
DANG, N ;
PANIZZA, M ;
BANDINELLI, S ;
FRIAUF, W ;
HALLETT, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04) :350-357
[3]   LOCALIZING THE SITE OF MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION IN HUMANS [J].
EPSTEIN, CM ;
SCHWARTZBERG, DG ;
DAVEY, KR ;
SUDDERTH, DB .
NEUROLOGY, 1990, 40 (04) :666-670
[4]   REALISTIC CONDUCTIVITY GEOMETRY MODEL OF THE HUMAN HEAD FOR INTERPRETATION OF NEUROMAGNETIC DATA [J].
HAMALAINEN, MS ;
SARVAS, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1989, 36 (02) :165-171
[5]  
Ilmoniemi RJ, 1999, CRIT REV BIOMED ENG, V27, P241
[6]   RADIAL ANISOTROPY ADDED TO A SPHERICALLY SYMMETRICAL CONDUCTOR DOES NOT AFFECT THE EXTERNAL MAGNETIC-FIELD DUE TO INTERNAL SOURCES [J].
ILMONIEMI, RJ .
EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 1995, 30 (05) :313-316
[7]  
ILMONIEMI RJ, 1996, ADV OCCUPATIONAL MED, V2
[8]   TECHNICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF MAGNETIC NERVE-STIMULATION [J].
JALINOUS, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (01) :10-25
[9]   The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Kammer, T ;
Beck, S ;
Erb, M ;
Grodd, W .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (11) :2015-2021
[10]  
Kammer T, 2003, SUPPL CLIN NEUROPHYS, V56, P198