Trabecular bone structure of the distal radius, the calcaneus, and the spine -: Which site predicts fracture status of the spine best?

被引:45
作者
Link, TM [1 ]
Bauer, J
Kollstedt, A
Stumpf, I
Hudelmaier, M
Settles, M
Majumdar, S
Lochmüller, EM
Eckstein, F
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Anat, Munich, Germany
[3] Paracelsus Med Private Univ, Salzburg, Austria
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Munich, Klinikum Innenstadt, Dept Gynecol, Munich, Germany
关键词
osteoporosis; bone mineral density; trabecular bone structure; high-resolution MRI; thin-section CT;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000129154.50654.4e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To compare trabecular bone structure measures obtained in magnetic resonance images of the distal radius and the calcaneus as well as computed tomographic images of the spine versus bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and the calcaneus in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fracture status. Material and Methods: High-resolution magnetic resonance images of the calcaneus and the distal radius and thin-section computed tomographic images of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were obtained from 74 cadavers. Structure analysis was performed using parameters analogous to standard histomorphometry. BMD of the spine was determined by using quantitative computed tomography and of the calcaneus by using dual x-ray absorptiometry. Spine radiographs of these cadavers were assessed concerning vertebral deformities. Results: The diagnostic performance in differentiating fracture and nonfracture subjects was highest for structure parameters in the spine and slightly lower for these parameters in the distal radius and for BMD of the spine. Conclusion: In this study structure parameters in the spine were best suited to predict the osteoporotic fracture status of the spine.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 497
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Bauer JS, 2004, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V176, P709, DOI 10.1055/s-2004-813079
[2]  
BENHAMOU CL, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1909
[3]   A comparison of spinal quantitative computed tomography with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in European women with vertebral and nonvertebral fractures [J].
Bergot, C ;
Laval-Jeantet, AM ;
Hutchinson, K ;
Dautraix, I ;
Caulin, F ;
Genant, HK .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 68 (02) :74-82
[4]   Local 3D scaling properties for the analysis of trabecular bone extracted from high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of human trabecular bone - Comparison with bone mineral density in the prediction of biomechanical strength in vitro [J].
Boehm, HF ;
Raeth, C ;
Monetti, RA ;
Mueller, D ;
Newitt, D ;
Majumdar, S ;
Rummeny, E ;
Morfill, G ;
Link, TM .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (05) :269-280
[5]   Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: Preliminary in vivo MR imaging assessment in men with osteoporosis [J].
Boutry, N ;
Cortet, B ;
Dubois, P ;
Marchandise, X ;
Cotten, A .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) :708-717
[6]   CT IMAGE-ANALYSIS OF THE VERTEBRAL TRABECULAR NETWORK INVIVO [J].
CHEVALIER, F ;
LAVALJEANTET, AM ;
LAVALJEANTET, M ;
BERGOT, C .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 51 (01) :8-13
[7]   In vivo comparison between computed tomography and magnetic resonance image analysis of the distal radius in the assessment of osteoporosis [J].
Cortet, B ;
Boutry, N ;
Dubois, P ;
Bourel, P ;
Cotten, A ;
Marchandise, X .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (01) :15-26
[8]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[9]   VERTEBRAL FRACTURE ASSESSMENT USING A SEMIQUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUE [J].
GENANT, HK ;
WU, CY ;
VANKUIJK, C ;
NEVITT, MC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1993, 8 (09) :1137-1148
[10]   A NEW METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF THE RADIOGRAPHIC TRABECULAR PATTERN [J].
GERAETS, WGM ;
VANDERSTELT, PF ;
NETELENBOS, CJ ;
ELDERS, PJM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1990, 5 (03) :227-233