Towards good ecological status of surface waters in Europe -: interpretation and harmonisation of the concept

被引:90
作者
Heiskanen, AS [1 ]
van de Bund, W [1 ]
Cardoso, AC [1 ]
Nöges, P [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Inland & Marine Waters Unit, Directorate Gen Joint Res Ctr, I-21020 Ispra, VA, Italy
关键词
classification; ecological quality ratio; intercalibration; reference conditions; typology; Water Framework Directive;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2004.0447
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is a new legislative framework to manage, use, protect, and restore surface water and groundwater resources and coastal waters in the European Union (EU). The aim is to ensure sustainable water management and to reach good water quality by 2015. The assessment of the ecological status and setting of the practical management goals require several steps. The process has started with the characterisation of the river basins including identification of surface water bodies and types, and identification of significant anthropogenic pressures and impacts. The water bodies will be classified in five quality classes (high, good, moderate, poor, bad) based on the Ecological Quality Ratio, which is a ratio between reference conditions and measured status of the biological quality elements. The normative criteria for high, good and moderate ecological status described in the WFD need to be made operational because those will be used to set the practical quality targets for surface water management. National ecological assessment systems and classifications will be harmonised through the WFD intercalibration exercise in order to ensure an equal level of ambition in achieving good surface waters status all over Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:9
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship [J].
Chase, JM ;
Leibold, MA .
NATURE, 2002, 416 (6879) :427-430
[2]  
*EEA, 2003, EUR WAT IND BAS ASS, P23
[3]  
JOHNSON RK, 1995, P 12 INT S CHIR CANB, P11
[4]   Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning [J].
Worm, B ;
Lotze, HK ;
Hillebrand, H ;
Sommer, U .
NATURE, 2002, 417 (6891) :848-851
[5]  
Wright John F., 2000, P1
[6]  
2003, 200060EC
[7]  
2001, STRATEGIC DOCUMENT C