Measurement of body fat by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioimpedance analysis in men with prostate cancer

被引:11
作者
Smith, MR
Fuchs, V
Anderson, EJ
Fallon, MA
Manola, J
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Hematol & Oncol, Inst Hlth Profess, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Mallinckrodt Gen Clin Res Ctr, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
body composition; body fat; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; bioelectrical impedance; prostatatic neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00821-3
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 [营养与食品卫生学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of body fat (%BF) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using a standard adult equation and BIA using a standard geriatric equation in a population of older men with prostate cancer and to compare the results from these different methods. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 38 men with locally advanced, node-positive. or recur-rent prostate cancer and no history of androgen-deprivation therapy. Bode composition was evaluated by DXA with the use of a Hologic 4500A densitometer and BIA. BIA %BF was calculated by using standard equations developed for adult and geriatric populations. RESULTS: %BF by DXA, BIA with the standard adult equation, BIA with the standard geriatric equation, and BIA with the a.-e-appropriate equation were 26.7 +/- 5.3%, 22.5 +/- 5.6%, 38.2 +/- 6.9%, and 35.4 +/- 9.6%. respectively. There were statistically significant differences between %BF by DXA and all BIA estimates. By using the methods described by Bland and Altman (Lancet 1986:1(84761):307). the standard adult equation showed the least bias and variability. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of men with prostate cancer, BIA with the standard adult equation provided a reasonable estimate of %BF compared with DXA. although the differences were statistically significant. BIA with the standard geriatric equation, however, markedly overestimated %BF compared with DXA, even when its use was restricted to elderly men.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 577
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Body size and prostate cancer: A 20-year follow-up study among 135006 Swedish construction workers [J].
Andersson, SO ;
Wolk, A ;
Bergstrom, R ;
Adami, HO ;
Engholm, G ;
Englund, A ;
Nyren, O .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (05) :385-389
[2]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]
Association of smoking, body mass, and physical activity with risk of prostate cancer in the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study (United States) [J].
Cerhan, JR ;
Torner, JC ;
Lynch, CF ;
Rubenstein, LM ;
Lemke, JH ;
Cohen, MB ;
Lubaroff, DM ;
Wallace, RB .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1997, 8 (02) :229-238
[4]
ASSESSMENT OF BODY-COMPOSITION BY BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE IN A POPULATION AGED GREATER-THAN-60-Y [J].
DEURENBERG, P ;
VANDERKOOIJ, K ;
EVERS, P ;
HULSHOF, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1990, 51 (01) :3-6
[5]
Cancer statistics, 2000 [J].
Greenlee, RT ;
Murray, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2000, 50 (01) :7-33
[6]
Quantitative assessment of cross-sectional muscle area, functional status, and muscle strength in men with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome wasting syndrome [J].
Grinspoon, S ;
Corcoran, C ;
Rosenthal, D ;
Stanley, T ;
Parlman, K ;
Costello, M ;
Treat, M ;
Davis, S ;
Burrows, B ;
Basgoz, N ;
Klibanski, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1999, 84 (01) :201-206
[7]
Guo SS, 1996, AM J CLIN NUTR, V64, P428
[8]
VALIDATION OF BODY-COMPOSITION BY DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DEXA) [J].
HAARBO, J ;
GOTFREDSEN, A ;
HASSAGER, C ;
CHRISTIANSEN, C .
CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 11 (04) :331-341
[9]
Hansen RD, 1999, AM J CLIN NUTR, V70, P228
[10]
VALIDATION OF TETRAPOLAR BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE METHOD TO ASSESS HUMAN-BODY COMPOSITION [J].
LUKASKI, HC ;
BOLONCHUK, WW ;
HALL, CB ;
SIDERS, WA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 60 (04) :1327-1332