Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies

被引:125
作者
Corley, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Boardman, P. Craig
Bozeman, Barry
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
interdisciplinary science collaboration; inter-institutional collaboration; epistemic norms; organizational structure;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Over the past three decades, U.S. science and technology funding agencies have increasingly supported large-scale, centralized, block grant-based research projects that often span multiple disciplines and institutions. This trend has developed at such a rate that research focused on understanding the management of these new collaborative models has largely not kept pace. We use two case studies of large-scale, multi-disciplinary collaborations to develop an institutional framework that illuminates the relationships among (a) the epistemic norms of the disciplines represented in the collaboration, (b) the organizational structure of these collaborations, and (c) the inter-institutional collaboration success. The results of our case study analysis demonstrate that large-scale, multi-discipline, inter-institutional collaborations need a relatively high level of development in either (1) the epistemic, development of the disciplines involved in the collaboration or (2) the organizational structure of the collaboration. We argue that the domain (i.e. epistemic or organizational) that provides the highest level of institutionalization is the one that organizes the "rules" of the collaboration. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 993
页数:19
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   PREVALENCE OF POLYCYSTIC OVARIES IN WOMEN WITH ANOVULATION AND IDIOPATHIC HIRSUTISM [J].
ADAMS, J ;
POLSON, DW ;
FRANKS, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6543) :355-359
[2]  
Aldrich H., 1979, ORG ENV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J IND STUDIES, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13662719300000001, 10.1080/13662719300000001CassimanB]
[5]   STUDIES IN SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION .2. SCIENTIFIC CO-AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY AND VISIBILITY IN THE FRENCH SCIENTIFIC ELITE, 1799-1830 [J].
BEAVER, DD ;
ROSEN, R .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1979, 1 (02) :133-149
[6]  
BECHEER A, 1989, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR
[7]   TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF DISCIPLINARY CULTURES [J].
BECHER, T .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1981, 6 (02) :109-122
[8]  
Bechtel William, 1986, Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Case Studies from the Life Sciences
[9]   R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - evidence for the German manufacturing industry [J].
Becker, W ;
Dietz, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (02) :209-223
[10]   IMPLEMENTING A 'BOTTOM-UP,'MULTI-SECTOR RESEARCH COLLABORATION: THE CASE OF THE TEXAS AIR QUALITY STUDY [J].
Boardman, Craig ;
Bozeman, Barry .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 15 (01) :51-69