A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases

被引:434
作者
Cowper, DC
Kubal, JD
Maynard, C
Hynes, DM
机构
[1] Hines VA Hosp, VA Informat Resource Ctr, VIReC 578 151V, Dept Vet Affairs Hlth Serv Res, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[2] Hines VA Hosp, Dev Serv Resource Ctr, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Edward Hines Jr Hosp, Midw Ctr Hlth Serv & Policy Res, Hlth Serv Res & Dev Serv Ctr Excellence, Hines, IL USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Inst Hlth Serv Res & Policy Studies, Evanston, IL USA
[5] US Dept Vet Affairs, Vet Affairs Edward Hines Jr Hosp, Cooperat Studies Program Coordinating Ctr, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[6] Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[7] NW Ctr Outcomes Res Older Adults, Seattle, WA USA
[8] Loyola Univ, Dept Med, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
MeSH headings; databases; mortality; vital statistics; veterans;
D O I
10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00285-X
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Mortality data are important tools for research requiring vital status information. We reviewed the major mortality databases and mortality ascertainment services available in the United States, including the National Death Index (NDI), the Social Security Administration (SSA) files, and the Department of Veterans Affairs databases. METHODS: The content, reliability, and accuracy of mortality sources are described and compared. We also describe how investigators can gain access to these resources and provide further contact information. RESULTS: We reviewed the accuracy of major mortality sources. The sensitivity (i.e., the proportion of the true number of deaths) of the NDI ranged from 87.0% to 97.9%, whereas the sensitivity for the VA Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator System (BIRLS) ranged between 80.0% and 94.5%. The sensitivity of SSA files ranged between 83.0% and 83.6%. Sensitivity for the VA Patient Treatment File (PTF) was 33%. CONCLUSIONS: While several national mortality ascertainment services are available for vital status (i.e., death) analyses, the NDI information demonstrated the highest sensitivity and, currently, it is the only source at the national level with a cause of death field useful for research purposes. Researchers must consider methods used to ascertain vital status as well as the quality of the information in mortality databases. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 468
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条