Percutaneous tracheostomy with single dilatation technique: A prospective, Randomized comparison of ciaglia blue rhino versus Griggs' guidewire dilating forceps

被引:76
作者
Ambesh, SP [1 ]
Pandey, CK [1 ]
Srivastava, S [1 ]
Agarwal, A [1 ]
Singh, DK [1 ]
机构
[1] Sanjay Gandhi Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200212000-00050
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Percutaneous tracheostomy with single-step dilation technique using Griggs' guidewire dilating forceps (GWDF) is a well-recognized procedure. Recently, Ciaglia has introduced a one-step dilation technique using a curved, gradually tapered dilator, the Ciaglia Blue Rhino (CBR). In a prospective, randomized study, we performed percutaneous tracheostomy in 60 consecutive patients, using either the CBR or the GWDF technique. Postoperatively, all patients had bronchoscopy by a blinded consultant, and stoma characteristics and injuries to the trachea were studied. Mean tracheostomy time (skin incision to insertion of tracheostomy tube) in the two procedures (CBR 7.5 min versus GWDF 6.5 min) was not different (P >0.05). The GWDF technique was associated with under-dilation and over-dilation of the tracheal stoma, each in almost one-third of patients. In the CBR group, the procedure was associated with a significant increase in peak airway pressure (P < 0.05) in all patients. There were nine cases of tracheal cartilage rupture, three cases of longitudinal tracheal abrasion, and one pneumothorax. Three patients had tracheal in-drawing at the scar site with huskiness of voice at 8 wk after decannulation; however, none had any breathing difficulty. We conclude that the techniques are equally effective in the formation of percutaneous tracheostomy. However, tracheal stoma over-dilation with GWDF and increase in peak airway pressure and rupture of tracheal rings with CBR remain major concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:1739 / 1745
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: The Ciaglia method versus the Rapitrach method [J].
Ambesh, SP ;
Kaushik, S .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (03) :556-561
[2]  
BODENHAM AR, 1993, ANAESTHESIA, V48, P101
[3]   Percutaneous tracheostomy: Ciaglia Blue Rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy [J].
Byhahn, C ;
Wilke, HJ ;
Halbig, S ;
Lischke, V ;
Westphal, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (04) :882-886
[4]  
Byhahn C, 2000, ANAESTHESIST, V49, P202, DOI 10.1007/s001010050815
[5]   AN EVALUATION OF A NEW PERCUTANEOUS TRACHEOSTOMY KIT [J].
CALDICOTT, LD ;
OLDROYD, GJ ;
BODENHAM, AR .
ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (01) :49-51
[6]  
CHEW JY, 1972, ARCHIV OTOLARYNGOL, V96, P538
[7]   ELECTIVE PERCUTANEOUS DILATATIONAL TRACHEOSTOMY - A NEW SIMPLE BEDSIDE PROCEDURE - PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
CIAGLIA, P ;
FIRSCHING, R ;
SYNIEC, C .
CHEST, 1985, 87 (06) :715-719
[8]  
Cobean R, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P265
[9]   A COMPARISON OF PERCUTANEOUS AND OPERATIVE TRACHEOSTOMIES IN INTENSIVE-CARE PATIENTS [J].
CROFTS, SL ;
ALZEER, A ;
MCGUIRE, GP ;
WONG, DT ;
CHARLES, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (09) :775-779
[10]  
DAYAL VS, 1986, LARYNGOSCOPE, V96, P58