Transformation of Arabidopsis with a Brassica SLG/SRK region and ARC1 gene is not sufficient to transfer the self-incompatibility phenotype

被引:19
作者
Bi, YM
Brugière, N
Cui, Y
Goring, DR
Rothstein, SJ
机构
[1] Pioneer Hi Bred Int Inc, Dept Agron Traits, Johnston, IA 50131 USA
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Mol Biol & Genet, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] York Univ, Dept Biol, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
来源
MOLECULAR AND GENERAL GENETICS | 2000年 / 263卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
self-incompatibility; SLG (S locus glycoprotein); SRK (S locus receptor kinase); ARC1 (arm repeat containing); transgenic Arabidopsis;
D O I
10.1007/s004380051213
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Self-incompatibility (SI) promotes outbreeding in flowering plants, and in Brassica SI is genetically controlled by the S locus. Self-incompatible Brassica and self-fertile Arabidopsis belong to the same crucifer family. In addition, a comparative analysis reveals a high degree of microsynteny between the B. campestris S locus and its homologous region in Arabidopsis - with the notable exception that the Brassica SI genes, SLG and SRK, are missing. Brassica ARCI encodes a component of the SRK signal transduction pathway leading to self-pollen rejection, and no closely related ARC1 homolog has been identified in Arabidopsis. The purpose of the research reported here was to introduce Brassica SI components into Arabidopsis in an attempt to compensate for the missing genes and to investigate whether the SI phenotype can be transferred. Inserts of approximately 40 kb from the fosmid clones F20 and F22, which span the B. napus W1 SLG-SRK region, were cloned into the plant transformation vector pBIBAC2. Transgenic plants were generated that expressed the Brassica SI genes in the flower buds. In addition, the endogenous, SLG-like, gene AtS1 was not co-suppressed by the Brassica SLG transgene. No SI phenotype was observed among the T1 BIBAC2-F20 and BIBAC2-F22 transgenic plants. When the ARCI gene was transformed into BIBAC2-F20 or BIBAC2-F22 plants. the resulting BIBAC2-F20-ARC1 and BIBAC2-F22-ARC1 plants still set seeds normally, and no rejection response was observed when self-incompatible B. napus W1 pollen was placed on BIBAC2-F20-ARC1 or BIBAC2-F22-ARC1 Arabidopsis stigmas. Taken together, our results suggest that complementing Arabidopsis genome with Brassica SLC, SRK and ARC1 genes is unlikely to be sufficient to transfer the SI phenotype.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 654
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] BECHTOLD N, 1993, CR ACAD SCI III-VIE, V316, P1194
  • [2] BOYES DC, 1995, PLANT CELL, V7, P1283, DOI 10.1105/tpc.7.8.1283
  • [3] Glutamine synthetase in the phloem plays a major role in controlling proline production
    Brugière, N
    Dubois, F
    Limami, AM
    Lelandais, M
    Roux, Y
    Sangwan, RS
    Hirel, B
    [J]. PLANT CELL, 1999, 11 (10) : 1995 - 2011
  • [4] High-Frequency Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana by Agrobacterium tumefaciens
    Clarke, Michael C.
    Wei, Wenbin
    Lindsey, Keith
    [J]. PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 1992, 10 (02) : 178 - 189
  • [5] Transgene-induced silencing of S-locus genes and related genes in Brassica
    Conner, JA
    Tantikanjana, T
    Stein, JC
    Kandasamy, MK
    Nasrallah, JB
    Nasrallah, ME
    [J]. PLANT JOURNAL, 1997, 11 (04) : 809 - 823
  • [6] Comparative mapping of the Brassica S locus region and its homeolog in Arabidopsis:: Implications for the evolution of mating systems in the Brassicaceae
    Conner, JA
    Conner, P
    Nasrallah, ME
    Nasrallah, JB
    [J]. PLANT CELL, 1998, 10 (05) : 801 - 812
  • [7] CUI Y, 2000, IN PRESS P NATL ACAD
  • [8] Structural and transcriptional comparative analysis of the S locus regions in two self-incompatible Brassica napus lines
    Cui, YH
    Brugière, N
    Jackman, L
    Si, YM
    Rothstein, SJ
    [J]. PLANT CELL, 1999, 11 (11) : 2217 - 2231
  • [9] DEBLAERE R, 1985, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V13, P4777, DOI 10.1093/nar/13.13.4777
  • [10] A molecular perspective on pollination in flowering plants
    Dodds, PN
    Clarke, AE
    Newbigin, E
    [J]. CELL, 1996, 85 (02) : 141 - 144