Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives

被引:363
作者
Madsen, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Danish Hydraul Inst, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark
关键词
hydrological modelling; distributed model; MIKE SHE; parameter estimation; automatic calibration; multiple objectives;
D O I
10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00092-1
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
A consistent framework for parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration is formulated. The framework focuses on the different steps in the estimation process from model parameterisation and selection of calibration parameters, formulation of calibration criteria, and choice of optimisation algorithm. The calibration problem is formulated in a general multi-objective context in which different objective functions that measure individual process descriptions can be optimised simultaneously. Within this framework it is possible to tailor the model calibration to the specific objectives of the model application being considered. A test example is presented that illustrates the use of the calibration framework for parameter estimation in the MIKE SHE integrated and distributed hydrological modelling system. A significant trade-off between the performance of the groundwater level simulations and the catchment runoff is observed in this case, defining a Pareto front with a very sharp structure. The Pareto optimum solution corresponding to a proposed balanced aggregated objective function is seen to provide a proper balance between the two objectives. Compared to a manual expert calibration, the balanced Pareto optimum solution provides generally better simulation of the runoff, whereas virtually similar performance is obtained for the groundwater level simulations. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 216
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1970, J Hydrol, V10, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
[2]  
[Anonymous], NORD HYDROL
[3]  
Bergstrom S., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P443
[4]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674
[5]  
Burnash R. J. C., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P311
[6]  
Cooper VA, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V36, P53, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00461-7
[7]   OPTIMAL USE OF THE SCE-UA GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR CALIBRATING WATERSHED MODELS [J].
DUAN, QY ;
SOROOSHIAN, S ;
GUPTA, VK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1994, 158 (3-4) :265-284
[8]   EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION FOR CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS [J].
DUAN, QY ;
SOROOSHIAN, S ;
GUPTA, V .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (04) :1015-1031
[9]   Global optimization techniques for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models [J].
Franchini, M ;
Galeati, G ;
Berra, S .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1998, 43 (03) :443-458
[10]  
Gan TY, 1996, WATER RESOUR RES, V32, P3513, DOI 10.1029/96WR02195