Embryo reduction and birth weight discordance in dichorionic twins

被引:10
作者
Audibert, F [1 ]
Boullier, M [1 ]
Boithias, C [1 ]
Kerbrat, V [1 ]
Vial, M [1 ]
Frydman, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 11, Hop Antoine Beclere, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Assistance Publ Hop Par, F-92140 Clamart, France
关键词
birth weight discordance; embryo reduction; growth restriction; twin birth;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/deg069
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Twin birth weight discordance is associated with a poor perinatal outcome. The aim of this study was to analyse the risk factors of growth discordance among dichorionic twin pregnancies. METHODS: A cohort of 346 dichorionic twin pregnancies delivered at one perinatal centre between January 1996 and December 1999 was analysed. Two groups were created, according to the presence or absence of intra-pair birth weight discordance (n = 75 and 271 respectively). Birth weight discordance was defined as a difference of greater than or equal to20% of the weight of the heavier twin. The two groups were compared by uni- and multivariate analysis, with regard to the woman's characteristics, risk factors for growth restriction or discordance, and outcome of pregnancy. RESULTS: Pregnancies with birth weight discordance had a poor outcome compared with pregnancies without discordance, with a 4-fold increase in neonatal mortality. The rate of iatrogenic embryo reduction was significantly higher in discordant pregnancies (14.7 versus 6.6%, P = 0.03). The risk of birth weight discordance was increased with a larger starting number of embryos before reduction [20.2% (64/317), 28.6% (6/21), 57.1% (4/7) and 100% (1/1) respectively, for an initial number of two (no reduction), three, four, and five embryos, P = 0.02]. In multivariate analysis, embryo reduction was the only significant risk factor for the occurrence of birth weight discordance [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.3 (1.0-5.2)]. CONCLUSIONS: Birth weight discordance carries a poor perinatal outcome. Embryo reduction is an independent risk factor for birth weight discordance in dichorionic twins. This finding emphasises the need for better control of assisted reproductive technology in order to avoid high-order multiple pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 440
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95:: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Bergh, T ;
Ericson, A ;
Hillensjö, T ;
Nygren, KG ;
Wennerholm, UB .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9190) :1579-1585
[2]
Risk for one or two very low birth weight twins: A population study [J].
Blickstein, I ;
Goldman, D ;
Mazkereth, R .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (03) :400-402
[3]
Twin birth weight discordance and risk of preterm birth [J].
Cooperstock, MS ;
Tummaru, R ;
Bakewell, J ;
Schramm, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (01) :63-67
[4]
Syndromes in twins [J].
DAlton, ME ;
Simpson, LL .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 1995, 19 (05) :375-386
[5]
Improvement in outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction with increased experience [J].
Evans, MI ;
Berkowitz, RL ;
Wapner, RJ ;
Carpenter, RJ ;
Goldberg, JD ;
Ayoub, MA ;
Horenstein, J ;
Dommergues, M ;
Brambati, B ;
Nicolaides, KH ;
Holzgreve, W ;
Timor-Tritsch, IE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (02) :97-103
[6]
FRASER D, 1994, J REPROD MED, V39, P504
[7]
Placental cord insertion and birth weight discordancy in twin gestations [J].
Hanley, ML ;
Ananth, CV ;
Shen-Schwarz, S ;
Smulian, JC ;
Lai, YL ;
Vintzileos, AM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (03) :477-482
[8]
Outcome of twin pregnancies according to intrapair birth weight differences [J].
Hollier, LM ;
McIntire, DD ;
Leveno, KJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (06) :1006-1010
[9]
BIRTH-WEIGHT BETWEEN 14 AND 42 WEEKS GESTATION [J].
KEEN, DV ;
PEARSE, RG .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1985, 60 (05) :440-446
[10]
Trends in twin birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1997 [J].
Kogan, MD ;
Alexander, GR ;
Kotelchuck, M ;
MacDorman, MF ;
Buekens, P ;
Martin, JA ;
Papiernik, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (03) :335-341