The effect of common and unique features in consumer choice

被引:108
作者
Dhar, R [1 ]
Sherman, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] INDIANA UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,BLOOMINGTON,IN 47405
关键词
D O I
10.1086/209477
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consumer choice often involves a comparison among the available alternatives. Recent research finds that features shared by alternatives are canceled and greater weight is placed on the unique features in choosing among the alternatives provided. Building on this research, the authors propose that the attractiveness of the choice set can be enhanced or reduced by altering which features appear unique. In the first study, this proposition is tested for choice problems in which subjects choose or delay choice between pairs of alternatives that have either shared bad features and unique good features (unique good pairs) or unique bad features and shared good features (unique bad pairs). As predicted, a greater percentage of subjects chose an alternative when there were unique good pairs than when there were unique bad pairs. A second study allowed subjects to switch from their initial choice to a new alternative with both unique good and unique bad features. The likelihood of switching to a new alternative was greater for subjects who made the initial choice from unique bad pairs. A third study used the choice context to increase the attractiveness of a specific alternative by making its good features appear unique. Finally, another study used think-aloud protocols to gain insights into the underlying mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 203
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   MEANINGFUL BRANDS FROM MEANINGLESS DIFFERENTIATION - THE DEPENDENCE ON IRRELEVANT ATTRIBUTES [J].
CARPENTER, GS ;
GLAZER, R ;
NAKAMOTO, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (03) :339-350
[2]  
CHERNEV A, 1995, EFFECT COMMON FEATUR
[3]  
DHAR R, IN PRESS J CONSUMER
[4]  
HELSON H, 1964, ADAPTATION LEVEL THE
[5]   FEATURE MATCHING, UNIQUE FEATURES, AND THE DYNAMICS OF THE CHOICE PROCESS - PREDECISION CONFLICT AND POSTDECISION SATISFACTION [J].
HOUSTON, DA ;
SHERMAN, SJ ;
BAKER, SM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 27 (05) :411-430
[6]   CANCELLATION AND FOCUS - THE ROLE OF SHARED AND UNIQUE FEATURES IN THE CHOICE PROCESS [J].
HOUSTON, DA ;
SHERMAN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 31 (04) :357-378
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF UNIQUE FEATURES AND DIRECTION OF COMPARISON ON PREFERENCES [J].
HOUSTON, DA ;
SHERMAN, SJ ;
BAKER, SM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 25 (02) :121-141
[8]   ADDING ASYMMETRICALLY DOMINATED ALTERNATIVES - VIOLATIONS OF REGULARITY AND THE SIMILARITY HYPOTHESIS [J].
HUBER, J ;
PAYNE, JW ;
PUTO, C .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1982, 9 (01) :90-98
[9]  
HUBER J, 1994, IMPACT SET QUALITY D
[10]  
JAIN SP, 1993, MARKETING LETT, V4, P302