Transformations in mixed models: Application to risk analysis for a multienvironment trial

被引:15
作者
Piepho, HP [1 ]
McCulloch, CE
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Crop Prod & Grassland Res, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
bivariate analysis; genotype X environment interaction; Johnson system; nonlinear mixed model; non-normality;
D O I
10.1198/1085711043569
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
An important trait in crop cultivar evaluation is stability of performance across environments. There are many different measures of stability, most of which are related to variance components of a mixed model. We believe that stability measures assessing yield risk are of particular relevance, because they integrate location and scale parameters in a meaningful way. A prerequisite for obtaining valid risk estimates is an appropriate model for the distribution of yield across environments. Multienvironment trials (MET) are often analyzed by mixed linear models, assuming that environments are a random sample from a target population, and that random terms in the model are normally distributed. The normality assumption may not always be tenable, and consequently, risk estimates may be biased. In this article, we suggest a transformation approach based on the Johnson system to cope with nonnormality in mixed models. The methods are exemplified using an international wheat yield trial. The importance of accounting for nonnormality in risk analyses based on MET is emphasized. We suggest that transformations should be routinely considered in analyses to assess risk.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 137
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, Journal of computational and Graphical Statistics, DOI [10.2307/1390625, DOI 10.2307/1390625]
  • [2] Bullock J. M., 1999, Aspects of Applied Biology, P205
  • [3] ON USING PERCENTILES TO FIT DATA BY A JOHNSON DISTRIBUTION
    CHOU, YM
    TURNER, S
    HENSON, S
    MEYER, D
    CHEN, KS
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 1994, 23 (02) : 341 - 354
  • [4] The analysis of the NSW wheat variety database .2. Variance component estimation
    Cullis, BR
    Thomson, FM
    Fisher, JA
    Gilmour, AR
    Thompson, R
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1996, 92 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [5] DeGroot M. H., 1989, PROBABILITY STAT
  • [6] Modelling expectation and variance for genotype by environment data
    Denis, JB
    Piepho, HP
    VanEeuwijk, FA
    [J]. HEREDITY, 1997, 79 (2) : 162 - 171
  • [7] CHOOSING PLANT CULTIVARS BASED ON THE PROBABILITY OF OUTPERFORMING A CHECK
    ESKRIDGE, KM
    MUMM, RF
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1992, 84 (3-4) : 494 - 500
  • [8] Genotype by environment variance heterogeneity in a two-stage analysis
    Frensham, A
    Cullis, B
    Verbyla, A
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (04) : 1373 - 1383
  • [9] Gilmour A. R., 1997, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, V2, P269, DOI 10.2307/1400446
  • [10] Average information REML: An efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models
    Gilmour, AR
    Thompson, R
    Cullis, BR
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1995, 51 (04) : 1440 - 1450