An Autologous Cartilage Tissue Implant NeoCart for Treatment of Grade III Chondral Injury to the Distal Femur Prospective Clinical Safety Trial at 2 Years

被引:105
作者
Crawford, Dennis C. [1 ]
Heveran, Chelsea M.
Cannon, W. Dilworth, Jr. [2 ]
Foo, Li Foong [3 ]
Potter, Hollis G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Hlth & Healing, Dept Orthopaed, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Radiol & Imaging, Magnet Resonance Imaging Div, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
cartilage repair; chondrocyte; chondral repair; articular cartilage injury; CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE; MICROFRACTURE TECHNIQUE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; KNEE-JOINT; DEFECTS; REPAIR; TRANSPLANTATION; SCAFFOLDS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0363546509333011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: The healing potential of damaged articular cartilage is limited. The NeoCart is a tissue-engineered collagen matrix seeded with autogenous chondrocytes designed for the repair of hyaline articular cartilage. Hypothesis: The NeoCart implant is well tolerated in the human knee. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Eight patients (treatment group) with full-thickness cartilage injury were treated with the NeoCart and evaluated prospectively. Autogenous chondrocytes provided by arthroscopic biopsy were seeded into a 3-dimensional type I collagen scaffold. The seeded scaffold was subjected to a tissue-engineering protocol including treatment with a bioreactor. Implantation of the prepared cartilage tissue patch was performed via miniarthrotomy and secured with a collagen bioadhesive. Evaluations through 24 months postoperatively included the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire, visual analog scale, range of motion, and cartilage-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including quantitative T2 mapping. Results: Pain scores after NeoCart implantation were significantly lower than baseline at 12 and 24 months after the procedure (P < .05). Improved function and motion were also noted at 24 months. Six patients had 67% to 100% defect fill at 24 months with MRI evaluation. One patient had moderate (33%-66%) defect fill, and another patient had poor (less than 33%) defect fill. Partial stratification of T2 values was observed for 2 patients at 12 months and 4 patients at 24 months. No patients experienced arthrofibrosis or implant hypertrophy. Conclusion: Pain was significantly reduced 12 and 24 months after NeoCart treatment. Trends toward improved function and motion were observed 24 months after implantation. The MRI indicated implant stability and peripheral integration, defect fill without overgrowth, progressive maturation, and more organized cartilage formation.
引用
收藏
页码:1334 / 1343
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
Akeson WH, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, pS124
[2]
Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee [J].
Bartlett, W ;
Skinner, JA ;
Gooding, CR ;
Carrington, RWJ ;
Flanagan, AM ;
Briggs, TWR ;
Bentley, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (05) :640-645
[3]
BARTZ RL, 2004, TECH KNEE SURG, V3, P198
[4]
Histological evaluation of chondral defects after autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee [J].
Briggs, TWR ;
Mahroof, S ;
David, LA ;
Flannelly, DJ ;
Pringle, J ;
Bayliss, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (07) :1077-1083
[5]
Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair [J].
Brittberg, M ;
Winalski, CS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A :58-69
[6]
TREATMENT OF DEEP CARTILAGE DEFECTS IN THE KNEE WITH AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BRITTBERG, M ;
LINDAHL, A ;
NILSSON, A ;
OHLSSON, C ;
ISAKSSON, O ;
PETERSON, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (14) :889-895
[7]
Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of cartilage repair in the knee [J].
Brown, WE ;
Potter, HG ;
Marx, RG ;
Wickiewicz, TL ;
Warren, RF .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (422) :214-223
[8]
Browne JE, 2005, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P237, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000164298.63534.64
[9]
Buckwalter, 1994, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V2, P192
[10]
Cherubino P, 2003, J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), V11, P10