Differential response of a sensitive and tolerant sugarbeet line to Cercospora beticola infection and UV-B radiation

被引:8
作者
Levall, MW
Bornman, JF
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Plant Physiol, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Plant Physiol, S-26123 Landskrona, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100104.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Increased ultraviolet-B (UV-B, 280-320 nm) radiation, due to depletion of stratospheric ozone, is an increasing threat to living organisms. Furthermore, increased ground level temperatures as a consequence of global warming may favour development of pathogens, such as Cercospora beticola, that thrive at high temperatures. This study evaluates the effect of combined UV stress and Cercospora leaf-spot disease on young sugarbeet plants (Beta vulgaris L.). An inoculum consisting of twelve European isolates of C, beticola Sacc, was used in the experiments, One Cercospora-sensitive and one Cercospora-tolerant sugarbeet line were analysed from growth regimes where plants were grown either under visible radiation alone or with supplemental UV-B, Photosynthetic pigments and partial reactions of photosynthesis, including potential yield and quantum yield under illumination, non-photochemical quenching (q(NPQ)) and photochemical quenching (q(P)), were measured to assess plant response. The combination of Cercospora a and supplemental UV-B radiation in the sensitive line resulted in a decreased photosynthetic efficiency, shown by q(NPQ) and quantum yield under illumination as compared with that for either stress applied alone. The F(v)/F(m) was unchanged for plants subjected to UV-B radiation without infection, although the q(NPQ) decreased, The Cercospora-tolerant line showed no significant differences under the different treatments, Thus, the line tolerant to Cercospora infection also proved to be tolerant to UV-B radiation alone and in combination with the infection.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 27
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Bjorn Lars Olof, 1996, International Journal of Environmental Studies, V51, P217, DOI 10.1080/00207239608711082
[2]  
BJORN LO, 1985, PHYSIOL VEG, V23, P555
[3]  
Bornman Janet F., 1993, P427
[4]  
BORNMAN JF, 1995, ENV PLANT B, P245
[5]  
Caldwell M.M., 1971, Photophysiology, V6, P131, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-282606-1.50010-6
[6]  
CALPOUZOS L, 1965, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V55, P1370
[7]   THE ROLE OF CAROTENOIDS IN RESISTANCE OF FUNGI TO CERCOSPORIN [J].
DAUB, ME ;
PAYNE, GA .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1989, 79 (02) :180-185
[8]   A CENTRAL ROLE OF SALICYLIC-ACID IN PLANT-DISEASE RESISTANCE [J].
DELANEY, TP ;
UKNES, S ;
VERNOOIJ, B ;
FRIEDRICH, L ;
WEYMANN, K ;
NEGROTTO, D ;
GAFFNEY, T ;
GUTRELLA, M ;
KESSMANN, H ;
WARD, E ;
RYALS, J .
SCIENCE, 1994, 266 (5188) :1247-1250
[9]   PHOTOPROTECTION AND OTHER RESPONSES OF PLANTS TO HIGH LIGHT STRESS [J].
DEMMIGADAMS, B ;
ADAMS, WW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 43 :599-626
[10]   STRESS-INDUCED PHENYLPROPANOID METABOLISM [J].
DIXON, RA ;
PAIVA, NL .
PLANT CELL, 1995, 7 (07) :1085-1097