The Complementary Relationship Between Institutional and Complexity Economics: The Example of Deep Mechanismic Explanations

被引:8
作者
Graebner, Claudius [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, ICAE, Linz, Austria
关键词
agent-based computational economics; complexity economics; evolutionary-institutional economics; philosophy of science; systemism; B25; B41; B52; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/00213624.2017.1320915
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Analyzing economic systems from an evolutionary-institutional or a complexity perspective are two complementary approaches to economic inquiry. I discuss three arguments in favor of this hypothesis: (i) eminent institutional economists have examined the economy as what today could be considered a complex system; (ii) complexity economists lack meta-theoretical foundations which could be provided by institutionalist theory; and (iii) institutional economists could benefit from using methods of complexity economics. In this context, I argue that scholars considering the economy to be complex should seek to explain it by discovering social mechanisms instead of focusing on prediction. In order to distinguish between alternative explanations, scholars should refer to the deepness of an explanation, rather than to Occam's razor.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 400
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1912, THEORY LEISURE CLASS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Conceptualising Capitalism
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ECONOCRACY
[4]  
Berger Sebastian, 2007, J ECON ISSUES, V41, P1
[5]   How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms [J].
Bunge, M .
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2004, 34 (02) :182-210
[7]  
Bunge M., 1999, Social science under debate
[8]  
Bunge Mario., 2012, Evaluating Philosophies
[9]   THE THEORY OF INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE [J].
BUSH, PD .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 1987, 21 (03) :1075-1116
[10]  
Cowen Tyler, 2005, SOCIAL MECH ANAL APP, P125