Impact of routine angiographic follow-up on the clinical benefits of paclitaxel-eluting stents - Results from the TAXUS-IV trial

被引:122
作者
Pinto, Duane S.
Stone, Gregg W.
Ellis, Stephen G.
Cox, David A.
Hermiller, James
O'Shaughnessy, Charles
Mann, J. Tift
Mehran, Roxana
Na, Yingbo
Turco, Mark
Caputo, Ronald
Popma, Jeffrey J.
Cutlip, Donald E.
Russell, Mary E.
Cohen, David J.
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Mid Carolina Cardiol, Charlotte, NC USA
[7] St Vincents Hosp, Indianapolis, IN USA
[8] Elyria Mem Hosp, Elyria, OH USA
[9] WakeMed, Raleigh, NC USA
[10] Washington Adventist Hosp, Takoma Pk, MD USA
[11] St Josephs Hosp, Syracuse, NY USA
[12] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[13] Boston Sci Corp, Natick, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.060
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effect of angiographic follow-up on revascularization rates in the TAXUS-IV trial and to determine whether the relative benefit of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare metal stent implantation was modified by angiographic follow-up. BACKGROUND Although several clinical trials have demonstrated that drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), virtually all of these studies have incorporated angiographic follow-up. METHODS In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 percutaneous coronary intervention patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) (n = 662) or identical-appearing BMS (n = 652). Clinical outcomes were compared, stratified by assignment to angiographic follow-up or clinical follow-up alone. RESULTS Compared with clinical follow-up alone, angiographic follow-up patients had a significantly higher rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.46; p = 0.04), with similar relative increases in PES and BMS patients. Because PES reduced TVR by similar to 60% regardless of type of follow-up, assignment to angiographic follow-up tended to overestimate the absolute benefit of PES relative to clinical follow-up alone. In contrast, assessment of end points immediately before the time of follow-up angiography led to substantial underestimation of the absolute benefit of PES implantation. CONCLUSIONS Performance of mandatory angiographic follow-up increases rates of TVR among patients receiving both BMS and PES and overestimates the absolute clinical benefits of PES relative to clinical follow-up alone. Nonetheless, PES substantially reduces TVR regardless of assignment to mandatory angiographic follow-up or not. Future studies designed to determine the true clinical benefits of DES should either forgo routine angiographic follow-up or separate the time of repeat angiography from the primary clinical end point by as long as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 36
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting: Perspectives from multicenter clinical trials [J].
Cutlip, DE ;
Chauhan, MS ;
Baim, DS ;
Ho, KKL ;
Popma, JJ ;
Carrozza, JP ;
Cohen, DJ ;
Kuntz, RE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (12) :2082-2089
[2]  
GRUENTZIG AR, 1979, NEW ENGL J MED, V301, P61
[3]   Long-term analysis of conventional coronary balloon angioplasty and an initial "stent-like" result - The NHLBI PTCA Registry [J].
Holmes, DR ;
Kip, KE ;
Yeh, WL ;
Kelsey, SF ;
Detre, KM ;
Williams, DO .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (03) :590-595
[4]   A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. [J].
Morice, M ;
Serruys, PW ;
Sousa, JE ;
Fajadet, J ;
Hayashi, EB ;
Perin, M ;
Colombo, A ;
Schuler, G ;
Barragan, P ;
Guagliumi, G ;
Molnar, F ;
Falotico, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (23) :1773-1780
[5]   Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery [J].
Moses, JW ;
Leon, MB ;
Popma, JJ ;
Fitzgerald, PJ ;
Holmes, DR ;
O'Shaughnessy, C ;
Caputo, RP ;
Kereiakes, DJ ;
Williams, DO ;
Teirstein, PS ;
Jaeger, JL ;
Kuntz, RE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (14) :1315-1323
[6]   Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II) [J].
Serruys, PW ;
van Hout, B ;
Bonnier, H ;
Legrand, V ;
Garcia, E ;
Macaya, C ;
Sousa, E ;
van der Giessen, W ;
Colombo, A ;
Seabra-Gomes, R ;
Kiemeneij, F ;
Ruygrok, P ;
Ormiston, J ;
Emanuelsson, H ;
Fajadet, J ;
Haude, M ;
Klugmann, S ;
Morel, MA .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9129) :673-681
[7]   Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. [J].
Stone, GW ;
Grines, CL ;
Cox, DA ;
Garcia, E ;
Tcheng, JE ;
Griffin, JJ ;
Guagliumi, G ;
Stuckey, T ;
Turco, M ;
Carroll, JD ;
Rutherford, BD ;
Lansky, AJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (13) :957-966
[8]   A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease [J].
Stone, GW ;
Ellis, SG ;
Cox, DA ;
Hermiller, J ;
O'Shaughnessy, C ;
Mann, JT ;
Turco, M ;
Caputo, R ;
Bergin, P ;
Greenberg, J ;
Popma, JJ ;
Russell, ME .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (03) :221-231