Electromagnetic wave speed in polar ice:: validation of the common-midpoint technique with high-resolution dielectric-profiling and γ-density measurements

被引:39
作者
Eisen, O [1 ]
Nixdorf, U [1 ]
Wilhelms, F [1 ]
Miller, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res, D-27515 Bremerhaven, Germany
来源
ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, VOL 34, 2002 | 2002年 / 34卷
关键词
D O I
10.3189/172756402781817509
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The accuracy of the travel-time-velocity and travel-time-depth profile derived from ground-penetrating radar (GPR) common-midpoint (CMP) surveys at different Frequencies is investigated for the first time ever by direct comparison with the profile calculated from high-resolution dielectric-profiling (DEP) ice-core data. Ill addition, we compare two travel-time profiles calculated from ice-core density data by means of different dielectrical mixture models with the DEP-based profile. CMP surveys Were carried out at frequencies of 25, 50, 100 and 200 MHz near the new European deep-drilling site DML05 in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, during the 1998/99 field season. All improved scanning capacitor for high-resolution DEP and a gamma-densiometer for density measurements were used to determine the complex dielectric constant and the density at 5 mm increments along the ice core B32, retrieved ill 1997/98 at DML05. The comparisons with DEP- and density-based velocity series show that the CMP velocity series are slightly higher but asymptotically approach the core-based velocities with depth. Root-mean-square differences of the DEP velocity series range between 8% for the 25 MHz CMP and 2% in the case of' the 200 MHz survey. Dcnsity-bascd velocities differ front the DEP velocities by <1%. The travel-time-depth series calculated from the interval velocities show a better agreement between all series than the velocity series. Differences are 5.7-1.4% for the 25 and 200 MHz CMP measurements, and <0.6% for the density data. Based oil these comparisons, we evaluate the accuracy with which the depth of electromagnetic reflectors observed in common-offset profiles call be determined, and discuss reasons for the observed differences between CMP- and core-based profiles. Moreover, We compare the errors determined front the field measurements with those estimated from GPR system characteristics to provide a measure that can be used to estimate the accuracy of GPR analyses for the planning of GPR campaigns. Our results show that CMP surveys are 1 useful technique to determine the depth of radar reflectors in combination with common-offset measurements, especially oil a region-wide basis.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Bogorodsky V. V., 1985, Radioglaciology
[2]   A NOVEL STRUCTURAL VARIANT OF THE HUMAN BETA-4 INTEGRIN CDNA [J].
CLARKE, AS ;
LOTZ, MM ;
MERCURIO, AM .
CELL ADHESION AND COMMUNICATION, 1994, 2 (01) :1-6
[3]  
Clough J. W., 1977, J GLACIOL, V18, P3
[4]  
Dix C.H., 1955, GEOPHYSICS, V20, P68, DOI DOI 10.1190/1.1438126
[5]   ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING OF WIDE-APERTURE GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR DATA [J].
FISHER, E ;
MCMECHAN, GA ;
ANNAN, AP .
GEOPHYSICS, 1992, 57 (03) :495-504
[6]   Nature of radio echo layering in the Antarctic ice sheet detected by a two-frequency experiment [J].
Fujita, S ;
Maeno, H ;
Uratsuka, S ;
Furukawa, T ;
Mae, S ;
Fujii, Y ;
Watanabe, O .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1999, 104 (B6) :13013-13024
[7]  
Garotta R., 1967, Geophys. Prospect, V15, P584, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2478.1967.tb01805.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2478.1967.TB01805.X]
[8]   Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi-offset, ground-penetrating radar [J].
Greaves, RJ ;
Lesmes, DP ;
Lee, JM ;
Toksoz, MN .
GEOPHYSICS, 1996, 61 (03) :683-695
[9]   A comparison of radio-echo sounding data and electrical conductivity of the GRIP ice core [J].
Hempel, L ;
Thyssen, F ;
Gundestrup, N ;
Clausen, HB ;
Miller, H .
JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 2000, 46 (154) :369-374
[10]   MEASUREMENTS OF RADAR WAVE SPEEDS IN POLAR GLACIERS USING A DOWN-HOLE RADAR TARGET TECHNIQUE [J].
JEZEK, KC ;
ROELOFFS, EA .
COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 8 (02) :199-208