Evaluation of GERD symptoms during therapy -: Part I.: Development of the new GERD questionnaire ReQuest™

被引:59
作者
Bardhan, KD
Stanghellini, V
Armstrong, D
Berghöfer, P
Gatz, G
Mönnikes, H
机构
[1] Dist Gen Hosp, Rotherham S60 2UD, S Yorkshire, England
[2] S Orsola M Malpighi Hosp, Bologna, Italy
[3] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] ALTANA Pharma AG, Constance, Germany
[5] Charite, Berlin, Germany
关键词
gastroesophageal reflux disease; heartburn; outcome measure; reflux questionnaire; symptom assessment; GERD; pantoprazole; treatment response; ReQuest; (TM); validation;
D O I
10.1159/000079707
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: The changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related symptoms on treatment are variously described, but currently available questionnaires have shortcomings. We therefore developed a self-assessment reflux questionnaire (ReQuest(TM)). This article describes the process of development and testing. Materials and Methods: For the first version of ReQuest(TM) the symptom spectrum of GERD and the various symptom descriptions were investigated. The 67 identified symptom descriptions were condensed empirically into 6 dimensions, to which a 7th dimension on general well-being was added. The symptom burden of the dimensions was measured by frequency and/or intensity. ReQuest(TM) was translated into different languages and then tested in focus groups. The initial validation was based on data from a clinical trial of patients with erosive GERD, treated with pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg daily for 28 days. Factor analyses determined the contribution of each symptom to the different dimensions. Additionally, correlation analyses between the identified factors and the dimensions were performed. Results: On the basis of factor analyses, ReQuest(TM) was reduced to a 60-item scale. The factors generated correlated strongly with the dimensions and confirmed the empirical process mathematically. Conclusion: ReQuest(TM) provides a valuable, self-assessment tool for evaluating the daily treatment response in patients with erosive GERD. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 237
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of a disease-specific symptom questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Allen, CJ ;
Parameswaran, K ;
Belda, J ;
Anvari, M .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2000, 13 (04) :265-270
[2]   Endoscopy-negative reflux disease [J].
Carlsson, R ;
Holloway, RH .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 14 (05) :827-837
[3]   Development of a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease - A validation study [J].
Colwell, HH ;
Mathias, SD ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Henning, JM ;
Hunt, RH .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1999, 44 (07) :1376-1383
[4]   Measuring symptom distress and health-related quality of life in clinical trials of gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: Further validation of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS) [J].
Damiano, A ;
Handley, K ;
Adler, E ;
Siddique, R ;
Bhattacharyja, A .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2002, 47 (07) :1530-1537
[5]   An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management - the Genval workshop report [J].
Dent, J ;
Brun, J ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Janssens, J ;
Kahrilas, PJ ;
Lauritsen, K ;
Reynolds, JC ;
Shaw, M ;
Talley, NJ .
GUT, 1999, 44 :S1-S16
[6]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS - AN IMPROVED EVALUATION OF TREATMENT REGIMENS [J].
DIMENAS, E ;
GLISE, H ;
HALLERBACK, B ;
HERNQVIST, H ;
SVEDLUND, J ;
WIKLUND, I .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 28 (08) :681-687
[7]  
*EUR AG EV MED PRO, 2000, ICH TOP E, V10
[8]  
*EUR AG EV MEDPROD, 1998, ICH TOP E, V9
[9]   SYMPTOMS AND DISEASE SEVERITY IN GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
GALMICHE, JP ;
DESVARANNES, SB .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 29 :62-68
[10]   A NEW QUESTIONNAIRE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
LOCKE, GR ;
TALLEY, NJ ;
WEAVER, AL ;
ZINSMEISTER, AR .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1994, 69 (06) :539-547