Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic Caries Monitor:: in vitro comparison

被引:35
作者
Bamzahim, M [1 ]
Shi, XQ [1 ]
Angmar-Månsson, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Inst Odontol, Dept Cariol & Endodontol, SE-14104 Huddinge, Sweden
关键词
caries detection; laser fluorescence; occlusal caries;
D O I
10.1080/000163502762667397
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
The Electronic Caries Monitor (ECM) and the recently introduced laser-based KaVo DLAGNOdent have been developed as clinical diagnostic aids in the detection and quantification of occlusal carious lesions. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare their reproducibility and validity. The ability of DIAGNOdent to retrieve sites of occlusal carious lesions without reference to photographs or drawings from previous assessments was also tested. The material comprised 87 premolar teeth: the occlusal surfaces were sound or exhibited non-cavity carious lesions of varying severity. All were photographed and measured by DIAGNOdent and ECM on 2 occasions, 2 weeks apart, The teeth were then sectioned into 300 gin thick slices. Two observers independently classified the sections according to the histopathology, into 5 categories, ranging from sound to dentinal caries in the inner part of the dentin. Statistical analysis comprised intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) to test reproducibility and regression analysis of validity. Sensitivity, and specificity were also calculated for detection of D3 lesions for both devices. DIAGNOdent recorded maximum readings at identical sites on both occasions in 89% of the teeth. The ICC for readings on 2 separate occasions was 0.97 for DIAGNOdent and 0.71 for ECM. The correlations with histology were r = 0.93 and 0.83, for DIAGNOdent and ECM, respectively. For detection of D3 lesions., the sensitivity and specificity were 0.8 and 1 for DIAGNOdent and 0.75 and 0.88 for ECM. In this in vitro study, DIAGNOdent was superior to ECM for occlusal caries detection.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 364
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Angmar-Mansson B, 1993, Adv Dent Res, V7, P70
[2]
Monitoring the caries process - Optical methods for clinical diagnosis and quantification of enamel caries [J].
AngmarMansson, B ;
AlKhateeb, S ;
Tranaeus, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1996, 104 (04) :480-485
[3]
Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods [J].
Attrill, DC ;
Ashley, PF .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2001, 190 (08) :440-443
[4]
Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth on the occlusal surface: An in vitro examination [J].
Ekstrand, KR ;
Ricketts, DNJ ;
Kidd, EAM .
CARIES RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (03) :224-231
[5]
Hibst R., 2000, Caries Research, V34, P323
[6]
HIBST R, 1998, CARIES RES, V32, P294
[7]
HIBST R, 1999, CARIES RES, V33, P295, DOI DOI 10.1159/000016530
[8]
Hibst R, 2001, MED LASER APPL, V16, P205
[9]
HUYSMANS MCD, 1999, EARLY DETECTION DENT, P123
[10]
Electrical methods in occlusal caries diagnosis: An in vitro comparison with visual inspection and bite-wing radiography [J].
Huysmans, MCDNJM ;
Longbottom, C ;
Pitts, NB .
CARIES RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (05) :324-329