Why the Eurocontrol Safety Regulation Commission Policy on safety nets and risk assessment is wrong

被引:9
作者
Brooker, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
关键词
Eurocontrol; Safety Regulation Commission; ATM; ATC;
D O I
10.1017/S0373463304002735
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Current Eurocontrol Safety Regulation Commission (SRC) policy says that the Air Traffic Management (ATM) system (including safety minima) must be demonstrated through risk assessments to meet the Target Level of Safety (TLS) without needing to take safety nets (Such as Short Term Conflict Alert) into account. This policy is wrong. The policy is invalid because it does not build rationally and consistently from ATM's firm foundations of TLS and hazard analysis. The policy is bad because it would tend to retard safety improvements. Safety net policy must rest on a clear and rational treatment of integrated ATM system safety defences. A new safety net policy, appropriate to safe ATM system improvements, is needed, which recognizes that safety nets are in integrated part of ATM system defences. The effects of safety nets in reducing deaths from mid-air collisions should be fully included in hazard analysis and safety audits in the context of the TLS for total system design.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 243
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
*BASI, 1991, LIM SEE AV PRINC
[2]  
BAUMGARTNER M, 2003, CONTROLLER JUL, P8
[3]   Future Air Traffic Management: Quantitative en route safety assessment Part 1 - Review of present methods [J].
Brooker, P .
JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2002, 55 (02) :197-211
[4]   Future Air Traffic Management: Quantitative en route Safety Assessment part 2 - New approaches [J].
Brooker, P .
JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2002, 55 (03) :363-379
[5]  
BROOKER P, 1977, 77002 CAA
[6]  
*DNV, 2003, 05201 TRS DNV
[7]  
*EUR, 2003, TARA23IP EUR
[8]  
*EUR SRC, 2003, SRC POL 2 US SAF NET
[9]  
*EUR SRC, 2000, EUR SAF REG REQ ESAR
[10]  
*FAA EUR, 1998, CONC PAP SEP SAF MOD