Gender and friendship: Why are men's best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive?

被引:92
作者
Bank, BJ [1 ]
Hansford, SL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Sociol, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00004.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Despite efforts to dismiss it, the finding that men's same-sex friendships are less intimate and supportive than women's is robust and widely documented. We tested six possible explanations for this finding: lack of parental models for friendship, emotional restraint, homophobia, masculine self-identity, competitive strivings, and role conflicts. Of these, emotional restraint and homophobia toward gay men provided the most explanatory power for gender effects on both intimacy and support in best friendships. Masculine self-identity mediated the relationship between gender and intimate-but not supportive-friendship; and having a same-sex parent with close friendships mediated the relationship between gender and supportive-but not intimate-friendship. Unexpected findings about the importance of a status orientation toward friendship suggest that researchers should abandon the male-deficit model of friendship in favor of studying the reasons why some men and women seek close same-sex friendships.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 78
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MENS FRIENDSHIPS
[2]  
[Anonymous], LOVE AM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, MCGILL REPORT MALE I
[4]  
BALSWICK JO, 1988, INEXPRESSIVE MALE
[5]   FRIENDSHIPS IN AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED-STATES - FROM FEMINIZATION TO A MORE HEROIC IMAGE [J].
BANK, BJ .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 1995, 9 (01) :79-98
[7]  
BANK BJ, 1997, INT HDB TEACHERS TEA, P879
[8]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[9]  
Bell Robert R., 1981, WORLDS FRIENDSHIP
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY [J].
BEM, SL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 42 (02) :155-162