q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core

被引:90
作者
Cabrerizo, F. J.
Alonso, S. [1 ]
Herrera-Viedma, E. [2 ]
Herrera, F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Software Engn Dept, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, E-18071 Granada, Spain
关键词
h-Index; m-Index; Bibliometric measures; Aggregation; Geometric mean; MULTIPLE DATA SETS; H-INDEX; STATISTICAL COMPARISONS; R-INDEX; A-INDEX; RESEARCHERS; CLASSIFIERS; INDICATORS; PHYSICISTS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Bibliometric studies at the micro level are increasingly requested by science managers and policy makers to support research decisions. Different measures and indices have been developed at this level of analysis. One type of indices, such as the h-index and g-index, describe the most productive core of the output of a researcher and inform about the number of papers in the core. Other indices, such as the a-index and m-index, depict the impact of the papers in the core. In this paper, we present a new index which relates two different dimensions in a researcher's productive core: a quantitative one (number of papers) and a qualitative one (impact of papers). In such a way, we could obtain a more balanced and global view of the scientific production of researchers. This new index, called q(2)-index, is based on the geometric mean of h-index and the median number of citations received by papers in the h-core, i.e., the m-index, which allows us to combine the advantages of both kind of indices. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) :273-289
[2]  
ALONSO S, 2009, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11192-009-0047-5
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISSI Newslett, DOI DOI 10.1177/01655515211014478
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Sci Focus, DOI DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/78/30002
[5]   Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?: a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (05) :830-837
[6]   What do we know about the h index? [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 58 (09) :1381-1385
[7]   On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin's A-index [J].
Burrell, Quentin L. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (02) :170-177
[8]   The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level [J].
Costas, Rodrigo ;
Bordons, Maria .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (03) :193-203
[9]   Hirsch-index for countries based on essential science indicators data [J].
Csajbok, Edit ;
Berhidi, Anna ;
Vasas, Livia ;
Schubert, Andras .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 73 (01) :91-117
[10]  
Demsar J, 2006, J MACH LEARN RES, V7, P1