Colon cancer risk counseling by health-care providers: Perceived barriers and response to an Internet-based cancer risk appraisal instrument

被引:14
作者
Fairfield, KM
Chen, WY
Colditz, GA
Emmons, KM
Fletcher, SW
机构
[1] Maine Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Portland, ME 04102 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Channing Lab, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Div Adult Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Med Sch, Dept Ambulatory Care & Prevent, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Med Sch, Div Community Based Res, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15430154jce1902_9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Risk appraisal instruments may be helpful in reinforcing prevention messages, although little is known about physician acceptance of such instruments. Objective. We explored perceived barriers to colon cancer risk counseling and responses to the colon cancer component of an Internet-based risk appraisal instrument. Methods. We qualitatively assessed provider perceptions of barriers to colon cancer prevention and screening, and their responses to the Harvard Cancer Risk Index using focus groups of primary care providers. Results. Many providers commented that the risk appraisal instrument may be most helpful to reinforce messages by a health-care provider. The tool may increase awareness about modifiable risk factors for cancer and help patients prioritize changes as well as improve screening acceptance. With regard to barriers to counseling patients about colon cancer prevention and screening, providers expressed concerns that behaviors are too difficult to change. In addition, they were frustrated by limited time for prevention counseling and poor reimbursement. Conclusions. The Internet-based risk index was well accepted, although providers thought it would be most effective when used to complement provider messages about prevention. Use of an Internet-based risk index along with physician counseling could help improve cancer prevention practices and cancer screening acceptance.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 97
页数:3
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, SELF EFFICACY
[2]  
BATTISTA R N, 1988, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, V4, P53
[3]   BRIEF INTERVENTIONS FOR ALCOHOL-PROBLEMS - A REVIEW [J].
BIEN, TH ;
MILLER, WR ;
TONIGAN, JS .
ADDICTION, 1993, 88 (03) :315-336
[4]   Harvard report on cancer prevention volume 4: Harvard Cancer Risk Index [J].
Colditz, GA ;
Atwood, KA ;
Emmons, K ;
Monson, RR ;
Willett, WC ;
Trichopoulos, D ;
Hunter, DJ .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2000, 11 (06) :477-488
[5]   A qualitative evaluation of the Harvard Cancer Risk Index [J].
Emmons, KM ;
Koch-Weser, S ;
Atwood, K ;
Conboy, L ;
Rudd, R ;
Colditz, G .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 1999, 4 (03) :181-193
[6]  
FRAME PS, 1992, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V45, P1192
[7]  
HOLT WS, 1991, J FAM PRACTICE, V32, P585
[8]   ATTRIBUTES OF SUCCESSFUL SMOKING CESSATION INTERVENTIONS IN MEDICAL-PRACTICE - A META-ANALYSIS OF 39 CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].
KOTTKE, TE ;
BATTISTA, RN ;
DEFRIESE, GH ;
BREKKE, ML .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 259 (19) :2882-2889
[9]  
Launoy G, 1993, Eur J Cancer Prev, V2, P229, DOI 10.1097/00008469-199305000-00006
[10]   SMOKING CESSATION - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED OVER THE PAST DECADE [J].
LICHTENSTEIN, E ;
GLASGOW, RE .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 60 (04) :518-527