Does ultrasound imaging before puncture facilitate internal jugular vein cannulation? Prospective randomized comparison with landmark-guided puncture in ventilated patients

被引:76
作者
Hayashi, H [1 ]
Amano, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Rosai Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Labor & Welfare Org, Amagasaki, Hyogo 6608511, Japan
关键词
carotid artery; central venous cannulation; internal jugular vein; jugular venodilation; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1053/jcan.2002.126950
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate whether prepuncture ultrasound evaluation of vascular anatomy facilitates internal jugular vein cannulation compared with landmark-guided puncture. Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Single community hospital. Participants: Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia (n = 240). Interventions: The right internal jugular vein was cannulated using either anatomic landmarks or prepuncture ultrasound (3.75/7.5 MHz) guidance. In the landmark group, respiratory jugular venodilation was used as the primary landmark for locating the vein. Results of cannulation and the incidence of complications were compared. Measurements and Main Results: Patients were randomly assigned to the ultrasound or landmark group. Respiratory jugular venodilation was identified in 188 patients (78.3%), in whom results of cannulation did not differ between the 2 techniques with respect to the venous access rate (cannulated at the first at-tempt: 83.5% in the landmark v 85.7% in the ultrasound group), the success rate (cannulated within attempts: 96.9% v 95.6%), and the incidence of arterial puncture (1.0% v 3.3%). In the remaining 52 respiratory jugular venodilation-unidentified patients, the access rate (30.4% v 86.2%, p < 0.001) and the success rate (78.3 v 100%, p < 0.05) were significantly better in the ultrasound group, and no arterial puncture was recorded in the ultrasound group, whereas the incidence was 13.0% in the landmark group. The results were similar regardless of the ultrasound frequency used. Conclusion: Prepuncture ultrasound evaluation did not improve the result of right internal jugular vein cannulation compared with the respiratory jugular venodilation-guided approach. When the landmark was not observed, however, the prepuncture ultrasound guidance was helpful in facilitating the cannulation. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 575
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF POSITION AND DIFFERENT MANEUVERS ON INTERNAL JUGULAR-VEIN DIAMETER SIZE [J].
ARMSTRONG, PJ ;
SUTHERLAND, R ;
SCOTT, DHT .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 38 (03) :229-231
[2]   ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ANATOMY OF THE INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN RELEVANT TO PERCUTANEOUS CANNULATION [J].
BAZARAL, M ;
HARLAN, S .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1981, 9 (04) :307-310
[3]   INTERNAL-JUGULAR-VEIN PUNCTURE WITH A MARGIN OF SAFETY [J].
CIVETTA, JM ;
GABEL, JC ;
GEMER, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1972, 36 (06) :622-&
[4]  
DAILY PO, 1970, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V101, P534
[5]  
DEFALQUE RJ, 1974, ANESTH ANALG, V53, P116
[6]   ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED CANNULATION OF THE INTERNAL JUGULAR-VEIN - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON TO THE EXTERNAL LANDMARK-GUIDED TECHNIQUE [J].
DENYS, BG ;
URETSKY, BF ;
REDDY, PS .
CIRCULATION, 1993, 87 (05) :1557-1562
[7]   ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF INTERNAL JUGULAR-VEIN LOCATION - IMPACT ON CENTRAL VENOUS ACCESS [J].
DENYS, BG .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (12) :1516-1519
[8]   PERCUTANEOUS CANNULATION OF THE INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN IN PATIENTS WITH COAGULOPATHIES - AN EXPERIENCE BASED ON 1,000 ATTEMPTS [J].
GOLDFARB, G ;
LEBREC, D .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 56 (04) :321-323
[9]   Respiratory jugular venodilation: Its anatomic rationale as a landmark for right internal jugular vein puncture as determined by ultrasonography [J].
Hayashi, H ;
Ootaki, C ;
Tsuzuku, M ;
Amano, M .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2000, 14 (04) :425-427
[10]   Respiratory jugular venodilation: A new landmark for right internal jugular vein puncture in ventilated patients [J].
Hayashi, H ;
Ootaki, C ;
Tsuzuku, M ;
Amano, M .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2000, 14 (01) :40-44