Two solar cycles of nonincreasing magnetic flux

被引:63
作者
Arge, CN
Hildner, E
Pizzo, VJ
Harvey, JW
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, NOAA, Space Environm Ctr, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Natl Solar Observ, Tucson, AZ 85726 USA
关键词
solar magnetic flux; aa index; solar cycle variations; coronal holes;
D O I
10.1029/2001JA000503
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 [天文学];
摘要
[1] Since measurements began in the late nineteenth century, there has been a secular increase (with superposed ripples due to solar cycles) of the aa geomagnetic index [Mayaud, 1972]. Starting from this observation, Lockwood et al. [1999a, 1999b] conclude that the total open solar magnetic flux has increased by 41% from 1964 to 1995 and by 130% over all but the last 5 years of the twentieth century. However, solar data for more than two solar cycles - Carrington maps from Mount Wilson, and Wilcox Solar Observatories and newly reanalyzed data from the National Solar Observatory - show no secular trend in overall photospheric flux. More importantly, the magnetic flux open to interplanetary space (as calculated from photospheric measurements and assuming potential fields to a height of 2.5 R-.) fails to show evidence of a secular increase over the last two solar cycles. Like Lockwood et al., we do not explicitly take account of transient events. Thus both data and calculations imply that the Sun's average coronal magnetic flux has not increased over the last two solar cycles. Analysis of simulations with the potential field source surface model shows that the interplanetary magnetic flux is not simply related to the erupted photospheric solar magnetic flux. Both results are in agreement with the findings of Wang et al. [2000]. The topology, rather than the strength, of the emergent solar magnetic field may be a major determinant of the interplanetary magnetic field experienced at Earth.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
MAGNETIC FIELDS AND STRUCTURE OF SOLAR CORONA .I. METHODS OF CALCULATING CORONAL FIELDS [J].
ALTSCHULER, MD ;
NEWKIRK, G .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1969, 9 (01) :131-+
[2]
THE HELIOSPHERIC MAGNETIC-FIELD OVER THE SOUTH POLAR-REGION OF THE SUN [J].
BALOGH, A ;
SMITH, EJ ;
TSURUTANI, BT ;
SOUTHWOOD, DJ ;
FORSYTH, RJ ;
HORBURY, TS .
SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5213) :1007-1010
[3]
Increased magnetic storm activity from 1868 to 1995 [J].
Clilverd, MA ;
Clark, TDG ;
Clarke, E ;
Rishbeth, H .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 1998, 60 (10) :1047-1056
[4]
SOLAR-WIND AT TURN OF CENTURY [J].
FEYNMAN, J ;
CROOKER, NU .
NATURE, 1978, 275 (5681) :626-627
[5]
THE STRUCTURE OF THE HELIOSPHERIC CURRENT SHEET - 1978-1982 [J].
HOEKSEMA, JT ;
WILCOX, JM ;
SCHERRER, PH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1983, 88 (NA12) :9910-9918
[6]
A doubling of the Sun's coronal magnetic field during the past 100 years [J].
Lockwood, M ;
Stamper, R ;
Wild, MN .
NATURE, 1999, 399 (6735) :437-439
[7]
Our changing Sun [J].
Lockwood, M ;
Stamper, R ;
Wild, MN ;
Balogh, A ;
Jones, G .
ASTRONOMY & GEOPHYSICS, 1999, 40 (04) :10-16
[8]
AA INDEXES - 100-YEAR SERIES CHARACTERIZING MAGNETIC ACTIVITY [J].
MAYAUD, PN .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1972, 77 (34) :6870-+
[9]
POSSIBILITY OF DEDUCING INTERPLANETARY AND SOLAR PARAMETERS FROM GEOMAGNETIC RECORDS [J].
RUSSELL, CT .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1975, 42 (01) :259-269
[10]
A MODEL OF INTERPLANETARY AND CORONAL MAGNETIC FIELDS [J].
SCHATTEN, KH ;
WILCOX, JM ;
NESS, NF .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1969, 6 (03) :442-&