Diagnostic boundaries, reasoning and depressive disorder .1. Development of a probabilistic morbidity model for public health psychiatry

被引:12
作者
Wainwright, NWJ
Surtees, PG
Gilks, WR
机构
[1] MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge
[2] MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 2SR, Robinson Way
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0033291797005072
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background. In recent years diagnostic practice in psychiatry has become increasingly structured in an attempt to standardize definitions of disorders and improve reliability, At the same time there has been an increasing recognition of the need to take account of uncertainty in the process of diagnostic decision making. For the most part, diagnosis is still represented by a binary outcome while this is known to entail a substantial loss of information. Many diagnostic schemes involve, in part, taking thresholds on the numbers of symptoms required from symptom lists. Methods. A model is proposed here, using ideas derived from latent class analysis to permit generalization from these schemes through moving from a binary to a probabilistic measure of psychiatric case status and replacing thresholds with smoothed transitions. Results. An outcome measure is produced where disorder status is expressed in terms of probabilities without changing the meaning of the original measure. Prevalence estimates (using ICD-10 Depressive Episode criteria) are more stable and can be given with increased precision. Conclusions. Disorder status when expressed in this way retains more diagnostic information and provides a useful extension to traditional binary analyses when looking at prevalence and risk factor estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 845
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AITCHISON J, 1976, BIOMETRIKA, V63, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, OPCS Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity, Report
[3]  
BRUGHA TS, 1992, INT J METH PSYCH RES, V2, P11
[4]   THE SUBTYPING OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IN MEN AND WOMEN - A LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS [J].
CASTLE, DJ ;
SHAM, PC ;
WESSELY, S ;
MURRAY, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1994, 24 (01) :41-51
[5]   CHILD PSYCHIATRIC-DIAGNOSIS BY COMPUTER ALGORITHM - THEORETICAL ISSUES AND EMPIRICAL TESTS [J].
COHEN, P ;
VELEZ, N ;
KOHN, M ;
SCHWABSTONE, M ;
JOHNSON, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1987, 26 (05) :631-638
[6]   COMPARISON OF RESEARCH DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS IN AN EDINBURGH COMMUNITY SAMPLE [J].
DEAN, C ;
SURTEES, PG ;
SASHIDHARAN, SP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1983, 142 (MAR) :247-256
[7]  
DOAMARAL MB, 1995, METHOD INFORM MED, V34, P232
[8]  
DUNSMORE IR, 1966, J ROY STAT SOC B, V28, P568
[9]  
Efron B., 1993, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
[10]  
Everitt BS., 1984, INTRO LATENT VARIABL