Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer

被引:1066
作者
Rakha, Emad A.
El-Sayed, Maysa E.
Green, Andrew R.
Lee, Andrew H. S.
Robertson, John F.
Ellis, Ian O.
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Dept Histopathol Mol Med Sci, Nottingham, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham City Hosp Natl Hlth Serv Trust, Dept Surg, Nottingham, England
关键词
breast carcinoma; triple-negative phenotype; prognosis;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.22381
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
BACKGROUND. Triple-negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, and HER2-negative) is a high risk breast cancer that lacks the benefit of specific therapy that targets these proteins. METHODS. In this study, the authors examined a large and well characterized series of invasive breast carcinoma (n = 1944) with a long-term clinical follow-up (median, 56 months) by using tissue inicroarray. The series were also stained with concurrent immunohistochemical prognostic panels (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, androgen receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), P-cadherin, E-cadherin, and basal (CK5/6, CK14), and p53), to characterize this specific subgroup of breast cancer and to identify prognostic markers that can identify tumors with more aggressive behavior. RESULTS. of informative cases, 16.3% were of the triple-negative phenotype. The majority of these tumors were grade 3, ductal/no-specific-type carcinomas. There were positive associations with larger size, pushing margins, poorer Nottingham Prognostic Index, development of recurrence and distant metastasis, and poorer outcome. In addition, associations were found with loss of expression of androgen receptor and E-cadherin, and positive expression of basal cytokeratins (basal phenotype), P-cadherin, p53, and EGFR. In all tumors, tumor size, lymph node stage, and androgen receptor were the most useful prognostic markers. In the lymph node-positive subgroup, both size and androgen receptor retained their prognostic significance. However, in the lymph node-negative tumors, basal phenotype was the sole prognostic marker identified in this subgroup. Other parameters including age, histological grade, tumor size, vascular invasion or other biomarkers included in the current Study were not significant. CONCLUSIONS. The authors concluded that assessment of androgen receptor and basal phenotype, in addition to the established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tumor size, can be used to select high-risk and low-risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information oil treatment options in these triple-negative tumors. Cancer 2007;109:25-32. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 32
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma [J].
Abd El-Rehim, DM ;
Pinder, SE ;
Paish, CE ;
Bell, JA ;
Rampaul, RS ;
Blamey, RW ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Nicholson, RI ;
Ellis, IO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (08) :1532-1542
[2]
High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses [J].
Abd El-Rehim, DM ;
Ball, G ;
Pinder, SE ;
Rakha, E ;
Paish, C ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Macmillan, D ;
Blamey, RW ;
Ellis, IO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (03) :340-350
[3]
Androgen receptor expression in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer - Immunohistochemical, clinical, and prognostic associations [J].
Agoff, SN ;
Swanson, PE ;
Linden, H ;
Hawes, SE ;
Lawton, TJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 120 (05) :725-731
[4]
Towards a novel classification of human malignancies based on gene expression patterns [J].
Alizadeh, AA ;
Ross, DT ;
Perou, CM ;
van de Rijn, M .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2001, 195 (01) :41-52
[5]
Steroid hormone receptor status of mouse mammary stem cells [J].
Asselin-Labat, Marie-Liesse ;
Shackleton, Mark ;
Stingl, John ;
Vaillant, Francois ;
Forrest, Natasha C. ;
Eaves, Connie J. ;
Visvader, Jane E. ;
Lindeman, Geoffrey J. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (14) :1011-1014
[6]
c-erb-B2 expression and response to treatment in metastatic breast cancer [J].
Bezwoda, WR .
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 17 (01) :22-28
[7]
Ductal carcinoma in situ with basal-like phenotype:: a possible precursor to invasive basal-like breast cancer [J].
Bryan, BB ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Collins, LC .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 (05) :617-621
[8]
Validation of tissue microarray technology in breast carcinoma [J].
Camp, RL ;
Charette, LA ;
Rimm, DL .
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2000, 80 (12) :1943-1949
[9]
Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Livasy, Chad A. ;
Dressler, Lynn G. ;
Cowan, David ;
Conway, Kathleen ;
Karaca, Gamze ;
Troester, Melissa A. ;
Tse, Chiu Kit ;
Edmiston, Sharon ;
Deming, Sandra L. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Moorman, Patricia G. ;
Earp, H. Shelton ;
Millikan, Robert C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2492-2502
[10]
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO