Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: A randomized multicenter trial

被引:143
作者
Papatsonis, DNM
vanGeijn, HP
Ader, HJ
Lange, FM
Bleker, OP
Dekker, GA
机构
[1] FREE UNIV AMSTERDAM HOSP,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,DIV MATERNAL FETAL MED,NL-1081 HV AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] FREE UNIV AMSTERDAM HOSP,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,NL-1081 HV AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[3] ZUIDEERZEE HOSP,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,LELYSTAD,NETHERLANDS
[4] UNIV AMSTERDAM,ACAD MED CTR,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,NL-1012 WX AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00182-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy of nifedipine with ritodrine in the management of preterm labor. Methods: One hundred eighty-five singleton pregnancies with preterm labor were assigned randomly to either ritodrine intravenously (n = 90) or nifedipine orally (n = 95). The principal outcome assessed was delay of delivery. Results: Ritodrine was discontinued in 12 patients because of severe maternal side effects, and their results were excluded from further analysis. More women in the ritodrine group delivered within 24 hours (22 versus 11, P = .006), within 48 hours (29 versus 21, P = .03), within 1 week (45 versus 36, P = .009), and within 2 weeks (52 versus 43, P = .005) compared with those receiving nifedipine. There were significantly fewer maternal side effects in the nifedipine group. Apgar scores and umbilical artery and vein pHs were similar in both groups. The number of admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in the nifedipine group was significantly lower than in the ritodrine group (68.4 versus 82.1%, P = .04). Conclusion: Nifedipine in comparison with ritodrine in the management of preterm labor is significantly associated with a longer postponement of delivery, fewer maternal side effects, and fewer admissions to the NICU. ((C) 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.)
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 234
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   INHIBITION OF PROSTAGLANDIN-INDUCED UTERINE ACTIVITY BY NIFEDIPINE [J].
ANDERSSON, KE ;
INGEMARSSON, I ;
ULMSTEN, U ;
WINGERUP, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1979, 86 (03) :175-179
[2]  
BENEDETTI TJ, 1983, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V145, P1
[3]   COMPARISON OF NIFEDIPINE AND RITODRINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRETERM LABOR [J].
BRACERO, LA ;
LEIKIN, E ;
KIRSHENBAUM, N ;
TEJANI, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1991, 8 (06) :365-369
[4]  
*CAN PRET LAB INV, 1992, NEW ENGL J MED, V327, P308
[5]   EFFECTS OF CALCIUM ENTRY BLOCKER (NICARDIPINE) TOCOLYSIS IN RHESUS MACAQUES - FETAL PLASMA-CONCENTRATIONS AND CARDIORESPIRATORY CHANGES [J].
DUCSAY, CA ;
THOMPSON, JS ;
WU, AT ;
NOVY, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 157 (06) :1482-1486
[6]   THE USE OF CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY - A REVIEW [J].
FENAKEL, K ;
LURIE, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1990, 37 (03) :199-203
[7]   A COMPARISON OF TOCOLYSIS WITH NIFEDIPINE OR RITODRINE - ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY AND MATERNAL, FETAL, AND NEONATAL OUTCOME [J].
FERGUSON, JE ;
DYSON, DC ;
SCHUTZ, T ;
STEVENSON, DK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (01) :105-111
[8]   NIFEDIPINE PHARMACOKINETICS DURING PRETERM LABOR TOCOLYSIS [J].
FERGUSON, JE ;
SCHUTZ, T ;
PERSHE, R ;
STEVENSON, DK ;
BLASCHKE, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (06) :1485-1490
[9]  
GROSPIETSCH G, 1993, PRETERM BIRTH CAUSES, P279
[10]   EFFECT OF NIFEDIPINE ON DOPPLER FLOW VELOCITY WAVEFORMS IN SEVERE PRE-ECLAMPSIA [J].
HANRETTY, KP ;
WHITTLE, MJ ;
HOWIE, CA ;
RUBIN, PC .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 299 (6709) :1205-1206