Sophisticated experience-weighted attraction learning and strategic teaching in repeated games

被引:172
作者
Camerer, CF [1 ]
Ho, TH
Chong, JK
机构
[1] CALTECH, Div Humanities & Social Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 119260, Singapore
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jeth.2002.2927
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Most learning models assume players are adaptive (i.e., they respond only to their own previous experience and ignore others' payoff information) and behavior is not sensitive to the way in which players are matched. Empirical evidence suggests otherwise. In this paper, we extend our adaptive experience-weighted attraction (EWA) learning model to capture sophisticated learning and strategic teaching in repeated games. The generalized model assumes there is a mixture of adaptive learners and sophisticated players. An adaptive Learner adjusts his behavior the EWA way. A sophisticated player rationally best-responds to her forecasts of all other behaviors. A sophisticated player can be either myopic or farsighted. A farsighted player develops multiple-period rather than single-period forecasts of others' behaviors and chooses to "teach" the other players by choosing a strategy scenario that gives her the highest discounted net present value. We estimate the model using data from p-beauty contests and repeated trust games with incomplete information. The generalized model is better than the adaptive EWA model in describing and predicting behavior. Including teaching also allows an empirical learning-based approach to reputation formation which predicts better than a quantal-response extension of the standard type-based approach. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 188
页数:52
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
AMALDOSS W, 1998, THESIS U PENNSYLVANI
[2]  
ANDERSON C, 2001, ECON THEOR, V16, P689
[3]   RATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FINITELY REPEATED PRISONERS-DILEMMA - EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE [J].
ANDREONI, J ;
MILLER, JH .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1993, 103 (418) :570-585
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, GAME EQUILIBRIUM MOD
[5]  
BLUME A, 1999, LEARNING SENDER RECE
[6]   Adaptive learning and equilibrium selection in experimental coordination games: An ARCH(1) approach [J].
Broseta, B .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2000, 32 (01) :25-50
[7]  
Brown G.W., 1951, ACTIVITY ANAL PRODUC, V13
[8]  
CABRALES A, 2000, 501 U POMP FEBR
[9]   Loss-avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Camerer, CF .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (01) :165-194
[10]  
Camerer C, 1999, GAMES AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, P31