Ultrasensitive monitoring of HIV-I viral load by a low-cost real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay with internal control for the 5′ long terminal repeat domain

被引:81
作者
Drosten, Christian
Panning, Marcus
Drexler, Jan Felix
Haensel, Florian
Pedroso, Celia
Yeats, Jane
Kleber de Souza Luna, Luciano
Samuel, Matthew
Liedigk, Britta
Lippert, Ute
Stuermer, Martin
Doerr, Hans Wilhelm
Brites, Carlos
Preiser, Wolfgang
机构
[1] Bernhard Nocht Inst Trop Med, D-20359 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Hosp Univ Prof Edgard Santos, Serv Infectol, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Cape Town, Dept Med Virol, Inst Infect Dis & Mol Med, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Tamil Nadu Med Univ, Dept Expt Med, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[5] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Med Virol, D-6000 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1373/clinchem.2006.066498
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Current HIV-1 viral-load assays are too expensive for resource-limited settings. In some countries, monitoring of antiretroviral therapy is now more expensive than treatment itself. In addition, some commercial assays have shown shortcomings in quantifying rare genotypes. Methods: We evaluated real-time reverse transcription-PCR with internal control targeting the-conserved long terminal repeat (LTR) domain of HIV-1 on reference panels. and patient samples from Brazil (n = 1186), South Africa (n = 130), India (n = 44), and Germany (n = 127). Results: The detection limit was 31.9 IU of HIV-1 RNA/mL of plasma (> 95% probability of detection, Probit analysis). The internal control showed inhibition in 3.7% of samples (95% confidence interval, 2.32%-5.9%; n = 454; 40 different runs). Comparative qualitative testing yielded the following: Roche Amplicor vs LTR assay (n = 431 samples), 51.7% vs 65% positives; Amplicor Ultrasensitive vs LTR (n = 133), 81.2% vs 82.7%; BioMerieux NucliSens HIV-1 QT (n = 453), 60.5% vs 65.1%; Bayer Versant 3.0 (n = 433), 57.7% vs 55.4%a; total (n = 1450), 59.0% vs 63.8% positives. Intra-/interassay variability at medium and near-negative concentrations was 18%-51%. The quantification range was 50-10 000 000 IU/mL. Viral loads for subtypes A-D, F-J, AE, and AG yielded mean differences of 0.31 log(10) compared with Amplicor in the 103-104 IU/mL range. HIV-1 N and O were not detected by Amplicor, but yielded-up to 180 180.00 IU/mL in the LTR assay. Viral loads in stored samples from all countries, compared with Amplicor, NucliSens, or Versant, yielded regression line slopes (SD) of 0.9 (0.13) (P < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: This method offers all features of commercial assays and covers all relevant genotypes. It could allow general monitoring of antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings. (c) 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
引用
收藏
页码:1258 / 1266
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in human immunodeficiency virus infection
    Back, DJ
    Khoo, SH
    Gibbons, SE
    Barry, MG
    Merry, C
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2000, 22 (01) : 122 - 126
  • [2] Balakrishnan P, 2005, INDIAN J MED RES, V121, P345
  • [3] Quantification of viral load: Clinical relevance for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection
    Berger, A
    Braner, J
    Doerr, HW
    Weber, B
    [J]. INTERVIROLOGY, 1998, 41 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [4] Comparison between a nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and branched DNA test for quantifying HIV RNA load in blood plasma
    Berndt, C
    Müller, U
    Bergmann, F
    Schmitt, U
    Kaiser, R
    Müller, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2000, 89 (1-2) : 177 - 181
  • [5] Multicenter study of a commercial, automated polymerase chain reaction system for the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens in routine clinical practice
    Bogard, M
    Vincelette, J
    Antinozzi, R
    Alonso, R
    Fenner, T
    Schirm, J
    Aubert, D
    Gaudreau, C
    Sala, E
    Ruiz-Serrano, MJ
    Petersen, H
    Oostendorp, LAB
    Burkardt, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 20 (10) : 724 - 731
  • [6] HIV drug resistance
    Calmy, A
    Pascual, F
    Ford, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (26) : 2720 - 2721
  • [7] Clarke John R, 2002, Expert Rev Mol Diagn, V2, P233, DOI 10.1586/14737159.2.3.233
  • [8] Advances in laboratory testing for HIV
    Dax, EM
    Arnott, A
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2004, 36 (06) : 551 - 560
  • [9] Failure to quantify viral load with two of the three commercial methods in a pregnant woman harboring an HIV type 1 subtype G strain
    Debyser, Z
    Van Wijngaerden, E
    Van Laethem, K
    Beuselinck, K
    Reynders, M
    De Clercq, E
    Desmyter, J
    Vandamme, AM
    [J]. AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 1998, 14 (05) : 453 - 459
  • [10] Evaluation of a new PCR assay with competitive internal control sequence for blood donor screening
    Drosten, C
    Weber, M
    Seifried, E
    Roth, WK
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2000, 40 (06) : 718 - 724